Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-787 (跨界内存写) — Vulnerability Class 2200

2200 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-787 represents a critical memory management weakness where software incorrectly writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a buffer. This flaw typically arises from insufficient bounds checking, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations with malicious payloads. Exploitation often leads to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or privilege escalation by corrupting critical system structures or control flow data. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation and utilizing safe programming practices that enforce strict boundary checks before any memory operation. Employing modern languages with automatic memory management, such as Rust or Java, further reduces exposure by preventing direct pointer arithmetic. Additionally, static analysis tools and fuzzing techniques help identify potential out-of-bounds conditions during the development lifecycle, ensuring that buffer operations remain within their intended limits and preserving application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (3)
IntegrityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
OtherUnexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-1050 Sonos Era 300 Out-of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Era 300 8.8 -2025-04-23
CVE-2025-1274 RCS File Parsing Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability — Revit 7.8 High2025-04-15
CVE-2025-1276 DWG File Parsing Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability — AutoCAD 7.8 High2025-04-15
CVE-2025-26479 Dell PowerScale OneFS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PowerScale OneFS 3.1 Low2025-04-10
CVE-2025-2632 Out of Bounds Write Vulnerability in NI LabVIEW reading CPU info from cache — LabVIEW 7.8 High2025-04-09
CVE-2025-2631 Out of Bounds Write Vulnerability in NI LabVIEW in InitCPUInformation() — LabVIEW 7.8 High2025-04-09
CVE-2025-30297 Adobe Framemaker | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Adobe Framemaker 7.8 High2025-04-08
CVE-2025-30304 Adobe Framemaker | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Adobe Framemaker 7.8 High2025-04-08
CVE-2025-27194 Media Encoder | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Media Encoder 7.8 High2025-04-08
CVE-2025-27182 After Effects | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — After Effects 7.8 High2025-04-08
CVE-2025-27183 After Effects | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — After Effects 7.8 High2025-04-08
CVE-2025-2829 Local Code Execution Vulnerability in Arena® — Arena® 7.8AIHighAI2025-04-08
CVE-2025-2293 Local Code Execution Vulnerability in Arena® — Arena® 7.8AIHighAI2025-04-08
CVE-2025-2288 Local Code Execution Vulnerability in Arena® — Arena® 7.8AIHighAI2025-04-08
CVE-2025-30015 Memory Corruption vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP) — SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP) 4.1 Medium2025-04-08
CVE-2025-21441 Out-of-bounds Read in Windows WLAN Host — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-04-07
CVE-2025-21440 Out-of-bounds Read in Windows WLAN Host — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-04-07
CVE-2025-21439 Out-of-bounds Read in Windows WLAN Host — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-04-07
CVE-2024-45543 Out-of-bounds Write in Audio — Snapdragon 6.6 Medium2025-04-07
CVE-2025-20658 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MT2718, MT6781, MT6789, MT6835, MT6855, MT6878, MT6879, MT6886, MT6895, MT6897, MT6983, MT6985, MT6989, MT8196, MT8673, MT8676, MT8678, MT8781 6.4AIMediumAI2025-04-07
CVE-2025-20657 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MT6765, MT6768, MT6781, MT6789, MT6833, MT6853, MT6877, MT6885, MT8768, MT8771, MT8781, MT8786, MT8791T 6.7AIMediumAI2025-04-07
CVE-2025-20656 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MT6781, MT6789, MT6835, MT6855, MT6878, MT6879, MT6886, MT6895, MT6897, MT6983, MT6985, MT6989, MT6990, MT8196, MT8370, MT8390 6.8AIMediumAI2025-04-07
CVE-2025-20654 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MT6890, MT7622, MT7915, MT7916, MT7981, MT7986 9.8AICriticalAI2025-04-07
CVE-2025-24304 arkcompiler_ets_runtime has an out-of-bounds write vulnerability — OpenHarmony 3.3 Low2025-04-07
CVE-2025-3154 Out-of-bounds array write due to invalid VerticesPerRow in Xpdf 4.05 — Xpdf 7.8AIHighAI2025-04-02
CVE-2025-3017 TA-Lib ta_regtest test_minmax.c setInputBuffer out-of-bounds write — TA-Lib 5.3 Medium2025-03-31
CVE-2025-1268 Canon多款产品 安全漏洞 — Generic Plus PCL6 Printer Driver 9.4 Critical2025-03-31
CVE-2025-2750 Open Asset Import Library Assimp CSM File CSMLoader.cpp InternReadFile out-of-bounds write — Assimp 6.3 Medium2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2480 Santesoft Sante DICOM Viewer Pro Out-of-bounds Write — Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 7.8 High2025-03-20
CVE-2025-2020 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt VC6 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8 -2025-03-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写) represent 2200 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.