Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-787 (跨界内存写) — Vulnerability Class 2200

2200 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-787 represents a critical memory management weakness where software incorrectly writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a buffer. This flaw typically arises from insufficient bounds checking, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations with malicious payloads. Exploitation often leads to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or privilege escalation by corrupting critical system structures or control flow data. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation and utilizing safe programming practices that enforce strict boundary checks before any memory operation. Employing modern languages with automatic memory management, such as Rust or Java, further reduces exposure by preventing direct pointer arithmetic. Additionally, static analysis tools and fuzzing techniques help identify potential out-of-bounds conditions during the development lifecycle, ensuring that buffer operations remain within their intended limits and preserving application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (3)
IntegrityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
OtherUnexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-30322 Substance3D - Painter | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Substance3D - Painter 7.8 High2025-05-13
CVE-2025-27197 Lightroom Desktop | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Lightroom Desktop 7.8 High2025-05-13
CVE-2025-30318 InDesign Desktop | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — InDesign Desktop 7.8 High2025-05-13
CVE-2025-30175 Siemens多款产品 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 7.5 High2025-05-13
CVE-2025-1330 IBM CICS TX code execution — CICS TX Standard 7.8 High2025-05-08
CVE-2025-1329 IBM CICS TX code execution — CICS TX Standard 7.8 High2025-05-08
CVE-2025-30102 Dell PowerScale OneFS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PowerScale OneFS 5.5 Medium2025-05-08
CVE-2025-41431 TMM Vulnerability — BIG-IP 7.5 High2025-05-07
CVE-2025-20182 Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense Software and IOS XE Software IKEv2 Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 8.6 High2025-05-07
CVE-2025-32405 RT-Labs P-Net 缓冲区错误漏洞 — P-Net 7.5 High2025-05-07
CVE-2025-32404 RT-Labs P-Net 缓冲区错误漏洞 — P-Net 4.8 Medium2025-05-07
CVE-2025-32403 RT-Labs P-Net 缓冲区错误漏洞 — P-Net 4.8 Medium2025-05-07
CVE-2025-32402 RT-Labs P-Net 缓冲区错误漏洞 — P-Net 7.5 High2025-05-07
CVE-2025-32022 Finit has heap based buffer overwrite in urandom.so plugin — finit 4.6 Medium2025-05-06
CVE-2025-27132 arkcompiler_ets_runtime has an out-of-bounds write vulnerability — OpenHarmony 3.8 Low2025-05-06
CVE-2025-21468 Out-of-bounds Write in Computer Vision — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-05-06
CVE-2025-21467 Out-of-bounds Write in Computer Vision — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-05-06
CVE-2025-21462 Out-of-bounds Write in Computer Vision — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-05-06
CVE-2024-49835 Out-of-bounds Write in SPS Applications — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-05-06
CVE-2024-45581 Out-of-bounds Write in Audio — Snapdragon 6.6 Medium2025-05-06
CVE-2024-45563 Out-of-bounds Write in Camera Driver — Snapdragon 6.6 Medium2025-05-06
CVE-2025-46585 Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 7.5 High2025-05-06
CVE-2025-20668 MediaTek Chipsets 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MT6878, MT6897, MT6899, MT6989, MT6991, MT8775, MT8796 6.7AIMediumAI2025-05-05
CVE-2025-20671 MediaTek Chipsets 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MT2718, MT6878, MT6897, MT6899, MT6989, MT6991, MT8196, MT8391, MT8676, MT8678 6.4AIMediumAI2025-05-05
CVE-2025-1883 Out-Of-Bounds Write vulnerability exists in SOLIDWORKS eDrawings on Release SOLIDWORKS Desktop 2025 — SOLIDWORKS eDrawings 7.8 High2025-05-02
CVE-2025-35975 MicroDicom DICOM Viewer Out-of-bounds Write — DICOM Viewer 8.8 High2025-05-01
CVE-2025-4125 ISPSoft File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — ISPSoft 7.8 High2025-04-30
CVE-2025-4124 ISPSoft File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — ISPSoft 7.8 High2025-04-30
CVE-2025-22883 ISPSoft File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — ISPSoft 7.8 High2025-04-30
CVE-2025-2761 GIMP FLI File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP 7.8 -2025-04-23

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写) represent 2200 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.