Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-400 (未加控制的资源消耗(资源穷尽)) — Vulnerability Class 1398

1398 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-400 (未加控制的资源消耗(资源穷尽)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-400 represents a critical resource management weakness where software fails to properly control the allocation and maintenance of finite system resources, such as memory, CPU cycles, or file descriptors. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by triggering actions that consume excessive resources, leading to denial-of-service conditions that degrade performance or crash the application entirely. This often occurs through crafted inputs that force infinite loops, excessive data processing, or unbounded memory allocation. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement strict resource limits, including timeouts, maximum iteration counts, and memory caps. Additionally, employing robust input validation and monitoring tools helps detect abnormal consumption patterns early. By enforcing these controls, engineers ensure that applications remain resilient against resource exhaustion attacks, maintaining availability and stability even under malicious stress or unexpected load spikes.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
Common Consequences (2)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)
If an attacker can trigger the allocation of the limited resources, but the number or size of the resources is not controlled, then the most common result is denial of service. This would prevent valid users from accessing the product, and it could potentially have an impact on the surrounding envir…
Access Control, OtherBypass Protection Mechanism, Other
In some cases it may be possible to force the product to "fail open" in the event of resource exhaustion. The state of the product -- and possibly the security functionality - may then be compromised.
Mitigations (4)
Architecture and DesignDesign throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perha…
Architecture and DesignMitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to preven…
Architecture and DesignEnsure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
ImplementationEnsure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Examples (2)
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
class Worker implements Executor { ... public void execute(Runnable r) { try { ... } catch (InterruptedException ie) { // postpone response Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); } } public Worker(Channel ch, int nworkers) { ... } protected void activate() { Runnable loop = new Runnable() { public void run() { try { for (;;) { Runnable r = ...; r.run(); } } catch (InterruptedException ie) { ... } } }; new Thread(loop).start(); } }
Bad · Java
This code allocates a socket and forks each time it receives a new connection.
sock=socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); while (1) { newsock=accept(sock, ...); printf("A connection has been accepted\n"); pid = fork(); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2018-1114 Red Hat Undertow 安全漏洞 — undertow 7.5 -2018-09-11
CVE-2018-5391 The Linux kernel, versions 3.9+, IP implementation is vulnerable to denial of service conditions with low rates of specially modified packets — Kernel 7.5 -2018-09-06
CVE-2018-6554 Linux kernel 安全漏洞 — Linux Kernel 5.5 -2018-09-04
CVE-2018-10924 Red Hat glusterfs客户端安全漏洞 — glusterfs 5.5 -2018-09-04
CVE-2018-0410 Cisco Web Security Appliances AsyncOS Software 安全漏洞 — AsyncOS Software for Cisco Web Security Appliances 8.6 -2018-08-15
CVE-2018-0418 Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Router Software 输入验证错误漏洞 — ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Router Software 8.6 -2018-08-15
CVE-2018-10864 Redha redhat-certification 安全漏洞 — redhat-certification: 6.2 -2018-08-13
CVE-2018-6922 FreeBSD 安全漏洞 — FreeBSD 5.3 -2018-08-09
CVE-2018-5390 Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service — Linux Kernel 7.5 -2018-08-06
CVE-2016-8611 OpenStack Glance 输入验证错误漏洞 — openstack-glance 6.5 -2018-07-31
CVE-2018-10607 Martem GW6和GWM 安全漏洞 — TELEM GW6 7.5 -2018-07-31
CVE-2017-15119 QEMU 安全漏洞 — qemu 7.5 -2018-07-27
CVE-2018-10632 Moxa NPort 5210、5230和5232 安全漏洞 — NPort 5210, 5230, and 5232 7.5 -2018-07-24
CVE-2018-10608 SEL AcSELerator Architect 安全漏洞 — AcSELerator Architect 6.5 -2018-07-24
CVE-2018-0372 Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches 安全漏洞 — Cisco Nexus 9000 Series unknown 7.5 -2018-07-18
CVE-2018-3767 memjs 安全漏洞 — memjs 9.1 -2018-07-05
CVE-2018-0309 Cisco Nexus 3000和9000 Series Switches NX-OS 安全漏洞 — Cisco Nexus 3000 and 9000 unknown 7.7 -2018-06-21
CVE-2017-16086 ua-parser 安全漏洞 — ua-parser node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16098 charset 安全漏洞 — charset node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16099 no-case模块安全漏洞 — no-case node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16111 content模块安全漏洞 — content node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16113 parsejson模块安全漏洞 — parsejson node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16114 marked模块安全漏洞 — marked node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16115 timespan模块安全漏洞 — timespan node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16116 string模块安全漏洞 — string node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16117 slug 安全漏洞 — slug node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16118 forwarded模块安全漏洞 — forwarded node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16119 Fresh 安全漏洞 — fresh node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16136 method-override 安全漏洞 — method-override node module 7.5 -2018-06-07
CVE-2017-16137 debug模块安全漏洞 — debug node module 7.5 -2018-06-07

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-400 (未加控制的资源消耗(资源穷尽)) represent 1398 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.