Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Buy Us a Coffee

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3357

3357 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2019-15959 Cisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP Phones Local Script Execution Vulnerability — Cisco SPA525G2 5-line IP Phone 6.6 -2020-09-23
CVE-2019-1947 Cisco Email Security Appliance Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) 8.6 -2020-09-23
CVE-2019-1983 Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) 5.3 -2020-09-23
CVE-2020-3116 Cisco Webex Centers Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco WebEx Event Center 5.5 -2020-09-23
CVE-2020-3133 Cisco Email Security Appliance Content Filter Bypass Vulnerability — Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) 7.5 -2020-09-23
CVE-2020-15181 Admin account takeover in Alfresco Reset Password — AlfrescoResetPassword 9.3 Critical2020-09-18
CVE-2020-15186 Improper sanitization of plugin names in Helm — helm 3.4 Low2020-09-17
CVE-2020-15184 Aliases are never checked in Helm — helm 3.7 Low2020-09-17
CVE-2020-14338 Wildfly Xerces 输入验证错误漏洞 — Wildfly 9.1 -2020-09-17
CVE-2020-14513 CodeMeter 输入验证错误漏洞 — CodeMeter 7.5 -2020-09-16
CVE-2020-10715 Red Hat OpenShift web console 输入验证错误漏洞 — openshift/console 4.3 -2020-09-16
CVE-2020-16099 Gallagher Group Command Centre 输入验证错误漏洞 — Command Centre 4.3 Medium2020-09-15
CVE-2020-16216 Philips Patient Monitoring Devices Improper Input Validation — IntelliVue patient monitors 6.5 -2020-09-11
CVE-2020-15170 Missing access control in apollo-adminservice — apollo 7.0 High2020-09-10
CVE-2020-15168 File size limit bypass in node-fetch — node-fetch 2.6 Low2020-09-10
CVE-2020-9743 HTML injection in AEM's content editor component — Experience Manager 5.3 Medium2020-09-10
CVE-2020-15709 add-apt-repository print ASNI terminal codes — add-apt-repository 5.5 -2020-09-05
CVE-2020-3478 Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software File Overwrite Vulnerability — Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 8.1 High2020-09-04
CVE-2020-3495 Cisco Jabber for Windows Message Handling Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability — Cisco Jabber 9.9 Critical2020-09-04
CVE-2020-3542 Cisco Webex Training Unauthorized Meeting Join Vulnerability — Cisco Webex Meetings 5.3 Medium2020-09-04
CVE-2020-3546 Cisco Email Security Appliance Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) 5.3 -2020-09-04
CVE-2020-1890 Android WhatsApp 输入验证错误漏洞 — WhatsApp for Android 7.5 -2020-09-03
CVE-2020-7526 PowerChute Business Edition 输入验证错误漏洞 — PowerChute Business Edition software V9.0.x and earlier 9.8 -2020-08-31
CVE-2020-3397 Cisco NX-OS Software Border Gateway Protocol Multicast VPN Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco NX-OS Software 8.6 -2020-08-27
CVE-2020-3398 Cisco NX-OS Software Border Gateway Protocol Multicast VPN Session Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco NX-OS Software 5.8 -2020-08-27
CVE-2020-3454 Cisco NX-OS Software Call Home Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco NX-OS Software 5.0(1a) 8.8 -2020-08-27
CVE-2020-3496 Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco Small Business 250 Series Smart Switches Software 7.5 -2020-08-26
CVE-2020-3506 Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service Vulnerabilities — Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras 8.8 High2020-08-26
CVE-2020-3507 Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service Vulnerabilities — Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras 8.8 High2020-08-26
CVE-2020-3519 Cisco Data Center Network Manager Path Traversal Vulnerability — Cisco Data Center Network Manager 8.1 -2020-08-26

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3357 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.