Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1325 CNY

100%
Buy Us a Coffee

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3596

3596 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2021-27420 GE UR family input validation — UR family 5.3 Medium2022-03-23
CVE-2021-27418 GE UR family input validation — UR family 5.3 Medium2022-03-23
CVE-2021-4219 Imagemagick Studio ImageMagick 输入验证错误漏洞 — imagemagick 5.5 -2022-03-23
CVE-2021-44040 HTTP request line fuzzing attacks — Apache Traffic Server 7.5 -2022-03-23
CVE-2022-24774 Improper Input Validation leading to Path Traversal in CycloneDX BOM Repository Server — cyclonedx-bom-repo-server 7.1 High2022-03-22
CVE-2022-24775 Improper Input Validation in guzzlehttp/psr7 — psr7 7.5 High2022-03-21
CVE-2022-0415 Remote Command Execution in uploading repository file in gogs/gogs — gogs/gogs 8.8 -2022-03-21
CVE-2020-25721 Samba 输入验证错误漏洞 — samba 8.8 -2022-03-16
CVE-2021-42854 Directory Traversal Read/Write/Delete at PluginServlet — SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent 9.8 Critical2022-03-09
CVE-2021-42856 Reflected Cross-site Scripting at DsaDataTest — SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent 4.7 Medium2022-03-09
CVE-2021-42787 Directory Traversal Write/Delete/Partial Read at AgentConfigurationServlet — SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent 9.4 Critical2022-03-09
CVE-2021-42857 Directory Traversal Partial Write at AgentDaServlet — SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent 5.3 Medium2022-03-09
CVE-2021-42786 Remote Code Execution at AgentControllerServlet — SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent 9.8 Critical2022-03-09
CVE-2021-42853 Directory Traversal Delete/Read at AgentDiagnosticServlet — SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent 9.1 Critical2022-03-09
CVE-2022-25818 UWB stack 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Samsung Mobile Devices 6.5 Medium2022-03-08
CVE-2021-20302 ILM OpenEXR 安全漏洞 — OpenEXR 6.2 -2022-03-04
CVE-2022-24723 Improper Input Validation in URI.js — URI.js 5.3 Medium2022-03-03
CVE-2021-23192 Samba输入验证错误漏洞 — samba 7.5 -2022-03-02
CVE-2022-24720 Improper Input Validation in image_processing — image_processing 9.8 Critical2022-03-01
CVE-2022-24711 Remote CLI Command Execution Vulnerability in CodeIgniter4 — CodeIgniter4 9.4 Critical2022-02-28
CVE-2021-26617 Gabia Firstmall remote code execution vulnerability — Firstmall 8.1 High2022-02-25
CVE-2021-26618 Tmax ToOffice arbitrary file creation vulnerability — ToOffice 7.1 High2022-02-18
CVE-2020-25717 Samba 输入验证错误漏洞 — samba 8.8 -2022-02-18
CVE-2021-4120 snapd could be made to bypass intended access restrictions through snap content interfaces and layout paths — snapd 8.2 High2022-02-17
CVE-2022-20750 Cisco Redundancy Configuration Manager for Cisco StarOS Software TCP Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco Redundancy Configuration Manager 5.3 Medium2022-02-17
CVE-2022-24086 Adobe Commerce checkout improper input validation leads to remote code execution — Magento Commerce 9.8 Critical2022-02-16
CVE-2021-3781 Artifex Software Ghostscript 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — ghostscript 10.0 -2022-02-16
CVE-2022-25271 Drupal 输入验证错误漏洞 — Core 7.5 -2022-02-16
CVE-2021-22800 Schneider Electric Modicon M218 Logic Controller 输入验证错误漏洞 — Modicon M218 Logic Controller (V5.1.0.6 and prior) 7.5 -2022-02-11
CVE-2021-22787 Schneider Electric Modicon M340 输入验证错误漏洞 — Modicon M340 CPUs: BMXP34 (Versions prior to V3.40), Modicon M340 X80 Ethernet Communication Modules: BMXNOE0100 (H), BMXNOE0110 (H), BMXNOC0401, BMXNOR0200H RTU (All Versions), Modicon Premium Processors with integrated Ethernet (Copro): TSXP574634, TSXP575634, TSXP576634 (All Versions), Modicon Quantum Processors with Integrated Ethernet (Copro): 140CPU65xxxxx (All Versions), Modicon Quantum Communication Modules: 140NOE771x1, 140NOC78x00, 140NOC77101 (All Versions), Modicon Premium Communication Modules: TSXETY4103, TSXETY5103 (All Versions) 7.5 -2022-02-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3596 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.