Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3320

3320 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-32168 Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Azure Monitor 7.8 High2026-04-14
CVE-2026-27906 Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 21H2 4.4 Medium2026-04-14
CVE-2026-26154 Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability — Windows Server 2012 7.5 High2026-04-14
CVE-2026-22563 Ubiquiti UniFi Play PowerAmp和Ubiquiti UniFi Play Audio Port 安全漏洞 — UniFi Play PowerAmp 9.8 Critical2026-04-13
CVE-2026-22565 Ubiquiti UniFi Play PowerAmp和Ubiquiti UniFi Play Audio Port 安全漏洞 — UniFi Play PowerAmp 7.5 -2026-04-13
CVE-2026-6231 bson_validate may skip validation when processing certain inputs — C Driver 4.3 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-34855 Huawei EMUI和Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 5.7 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-40162 Bugsink affected by authenticated arbitrary file write in artifactbundle/assemble — bugsink 7.1 High2026-04-10
CVE-2026-5500 Improper Validation of AES-GCM Authentication Tag Length in PKCS#7 Envelope Allows Authentication Bypass — wolfSSL 3.7 -2026-04-10
CVE-2026-33797 Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: An attacker sending a specific genuine BGP packet causes a BGP reset — Junos OS 7.4 High2026-04-09
CVE-2026-32990 Apache Tomcat: Fix for CVE-2025-66614 is incomplete — Apache Tomcat 9.1AICriticalAI2026-04-09
CVE-2026-5329 Rapid7 Velociraptor Improper Input Validation in Client Message Handler — Velociraptor 8.5 High2026-04-09
CVE-2026-34178 Importing a crafted backup leads to project restriction bypass — lxd 9.1 Critical2026-04-09
CVE-2026-5919 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 8.1AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5915 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5887 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 6.5AIMediumAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5885 Google Chrome for Windows 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 6.5AIMediumAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5884 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5879 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-39410 Hono has a non-breaking space prefix bypass in cookie name handling in getCookie() — hono 4.8 Medium2026-04-08
CVE-2026-34197 Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Authenticated users could perform RCE via Jolokia MBeans — Apache ActiveMQ Broker 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-07
CVE-2026-34773 Electron: Registry key path injection in app.setAsDefaultProtocolClient on Windows — electron 4.7 Medium2026-04-03
CVE-2026-28797 RAGFlow: Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Agent "Text Processing" Component — ragflow 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-03
CVE-2026-34980 OpenPrinting CUPS: Shared PostScript queue lets anonymous Print-Job requests reach `lp` code execution over the network — cups 9.8AICriticalAI2026-04-03
CVE-2020-37216 Hirschmann HiOS EtherNet/IP Stack Denial of Service — Hirschmann HiOS 7.5 High2026-04-03
CVE-2026-34762 Ella Core Has Audit Log Falsification via Path/Body IMSI Mismatch in UpdateSubscriber — core 2.7 Low2026-04-02
CVE-2026-34760 vLLM: Downmix Implementation Differences as Attack Vectors Against Audio AI Models — vllm 5.9 Medium2026-04-02
CVE-2026-35038 signalk-server: Arbitrary Prototype Read via `from` Field Bypass — signalk-server 6.5AIMediumAI2026-04-02
CVE-2026-32629 phpMyFAQ: Stored XSS via Unsanitized Email Field in Admin FAQ Editor — phpMyFAQ 6.1AIMediumAI2026-04-02
CVE-2026-29144 Unicode Subject Tags — Secure Email Gateway 5.3AIMediumAI2026-04-02

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3320 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.