Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Buy Us a Coffee

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3320

3320 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-6547 On Node.js < 3, pbkdf2 silently disregards Uint8Array input, returning static keys 7.5 -2025-06-23
CVE-2025-6545 pbkdf2 silently returns predictable uninitialized/zero-filled memory for non-normalized or unimplemented algos supported by Node.js 7.5 -2025-06-23
CVE-2025-4563 Nodes can bypass dynamic resource allocation authorization checks — Kubernetes 2.7 Low2025-06-23
CVE-2025-6240 Profisee Path Traversal Vulnerability — Profisee 8.1AIHighAI2025-06-18
CVE-2025-1088 Very long unicode dashboard title or panel name can hang the frontend — Grafana 2.7 Low2025-06-18
CVE-2025-4613 Client side RCE in Google Web Designer App — Web Designer App 8.8AIHighAI2025-06-12
CVE-2025-47096 Adobe Experience Manager | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) — Adobe Experience Manager 3.5 Low2025-06-10
CVE-2025-0052 FlashBlade DOS Vulnerability — FlashBlade 7.5AIHighAI2025-06-10
CVE-2025-0051 FlashArray DOS Vulnerability — FlashArray 7.5AIHighAI2025-06-10
CVE-2025-47968 Microsoft AutoUpdate (MAU) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft AutoUpdate for Mac 7.8 High2025-06-10
CVE-2025-47171 Microsoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 6.7 Medium2025-06-10
CVE-2025-4680 upKeeper Instant Privilege Access 安全漏洞 — upKeeper Instant Privilege Access 9.1AICriticalAI2025-06-10
CVE-2025-3116 Schneider Electric Modicon Controllers 输入验证错误漏洞 — Modicon Controllers M241/M251 6.5 Medium2025-06-10
CVE-2025-3898 Schneider Electric Modicon Controllers 输入验证错误漏洞 — Modicon Controllers M241/M251 6.5 Medium2025-06-10
CVE-2025-1041 Avaya Call Management System RCE vulnerability — Avaya Call Management System 9.9 Critical2025-06-10
CVE-2025-0037 AMD Versal Adaptive SoC 输入验证错误漏洞 — Platform Loader and Manager (PLM) 6.6 Medium2025-06-09
CVE-2025-27242 Ssecurity_component_manager has an improper input vulnerability — OpenHarmony 3.3 Low2025-06-08
CVE-2025-27131 kernel_liteos_m has an improper input vulnerability — OpenHarmony 6.1 Medium2025-06-08
CVE-2025-1701 Local Privilege Escalation in MIM Admin Service — MIM Admin Service 7.5AIHighAI2025-06-04
CVE-2025-5455 Possible denial of service when passing malformed data in a URL to qDecodeDataUrl — Qt 6.5 -2025-06-02
CVE-2025-48944 vLLM Tool Schema allows DoS via Malformed pattern and type Fields — vllm 6.5 Medium2025-05-30
CVE-2025-4635 Remote Code Execution — Airpointer 6.6 Medium2025-05-30
CVE-2025-48490 Laravel Rest Api has a Search Validation Bypass — laravel-rest-api 9.1AICriticalAI2025-05-30
CVE-2025-33043 SMM buffer Integrity — AptioV 5.8 Medium2025-05-29
CVE-2025-27151 redis-check-aof may lead to stack overflow and potential RCE — redis 4.7 Medium2025-05-29
CVE-2025-41379 Injection vulnerability in Iridium Certus 700 — Iridium Certus 700 8.2AIHighAI2025-05-23
CVE-2025-41378 Injection vulnerability in Iridium Certus 700 — Iridium Certus 700 8.8AIHighAI2025-05-23
CVE-2024-25010 Ericsson RAN Compute and Site Controller 6610 - Improper Input Validation Vulnerability — Ericsson RAN Compute Basebands (all BB variants) 8.8 High2025-05-22
CVE-2025-3885 Harman Becker MGU21 Bluetooth Improper Input Validation Denial-of-Service Vulnerability — MGU21 6.5AIMediumAI2025-05-22
CVE-2021-25255 Yandex Browser Lite for Android prior to version 21.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. — Browser Lite 7.5AIHighAI2025-05-21

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3320 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.