Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 1863

1863 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-122 represents a critical memory safety weakness where an application writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a heap-allocated buffer, typically created via functions like malloc. This vulnerability arises when developers fail to validate input lengths or perform insufficient bounds checking before copying data into dynamically allocated memory regions. Attackers exploit this flaw by crafting malicious inputs that exceed buffer limits, allowing them to overwrite adjacent heap metadata or control structures. Such overwrites can corrupt the heap manager’s internal state, leading to application crashes, data leakage, or arbitrary code execution by hijacking control flow. To prevent heap-based buffer overflows, developers must rigorously validate all input sizes against buffer capacities, utilize safe string handling libraries that enforce length limits, and employ modern memory-safe programming languages that automatically manage memory boundaries, thereby eliminating manual pointer arithmetic errors.

MITRE CWE Description
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code. Eve…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, heap-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf; buf = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*BUFSIZE); strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
char * copy_input(char *user_supplied_string){ int i, dst_index; char *dst_buf = (char*)malloc(4*sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE); if ( MAX_SIZE <= strlen(user_supplied_string) ){ die("user string too long, die evil hacker!"); } dst_index = 0; for ( i = 0; i < strlen(user_supplied_string); i++ ){ if( '&' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ dst_buf[dst_index++] = '&'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';'; } else if ('<' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ /* encode to &lt; */ } else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i]; } return ds
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-49004 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-49005 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-49002 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-49001 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (CU 29) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48999 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-49000 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48997 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48998 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48993 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43622 Windows Telephony Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43621 Windows Telephony Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2025 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43620 Windows Telephony Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43598 LightGBM Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — LightGBM 8.1 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48996 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48995 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-48994 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43462 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2019 (CU 29) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-38255 SQL Server Native Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43626 Windows Telephony Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-43627 Windows Telephony Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2023-29125 Heap overflow in CM_main.exe binary in Enel X JuiceBox — JuiceBox Pro 3.0 22kW Cellular 9.0 Critical2024-11-05
CVE-2024-10525 Eclipse Mosquito: Heap Buffer Overflow in my_subscribe_callback — mosquitto 9.8 -2024-10-30
CVE-2024-9632 Xorg-x11-server: tigervnc: heap-based buffer overflow privilege escalation vulnerability 7.8 High2024-10-30
CVE-2024-8594 Autodesk AutoCAD MODEL File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Code Execution Vulnerability — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-10-29
CVE-2024-8591 Autodesk AutoCAD 3DM File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Code Execution Vulnerability — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-10-29
CVE-2024-8587 Autodesk AutoCAD SLDPRT File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Code Execution Vulnerability — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-10-29
CVE-2024-43579 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 7.6 High2024-10-17
CVE-2024-43578 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 7.6 High2024-10-17
CVE-2024-43587 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 5.9 Medium2024-10-17
CVE-2024-47964 Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Delta Electronics CNCSoft-G2 — CNCSoft-G2 8.8AIHighAI2024-10-10

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) represent 1863 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.