Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 1864

1864 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-122 represents a critical memory safety weakness where an application writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a heap-allocated buffer, typically created via functions like malloc. This vulnerability arises when developers fail to validate input lengths or perform insufficient bounds checking before copying data into dynamically allocated memory regions. Attackers exploit this flaw by crafting malicious inputs that exceed buffer limits, allowing them to overwrite adjacent heap metadata or control structures. Such overwrites can corrupt the heap manager’s internal state, leading to application crashes, data leakage, or arbitrary code execution by hijacking control flow. To prevent heap-based buffer overflows, developers must rigorously validate all input sizes against buffer capacities, utilize safe string handling libraries that enforce length limits, and employ modern memory-safe programming languages that automatically manage memory boundaries, thereby eliminating manual pointer arithmetic errors.

MITRE CWE Description
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code. Eve…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, heap-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf; buf = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*BUFSIZE); strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
char * copy_input(char *user_supplied_string){ int i, dst_index; char *dst_buf = (char*)malloc(4*sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE); if ( MAX_SIZE <= strlen(user_supplied_string) ){ die("user string too long, die evil hacker!"); } dst_index = 0; for ( i = 0; i < strlen(user_supplied_string); i++ ){ if( '&' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ dst_buf[dst_index++] = '&'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';'; } else if ('<' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ /* encode to &lt; */ } else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i]; } return ds
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-38170 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.1 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38169 Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 7.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38154 Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 8.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38152 Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38142 Windows Secure Kernel Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38130 Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 11 Version 24H2 8.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38121 Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 8.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38116 Windows IP Routing Management Snapin Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38114 Windows IP Routing Management Snapin Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 11 Version 24H2 8.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38115 Windows IP Routing Management Snapin Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 11 Version 24H2 8.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38172 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.8 High2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38161 Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 6.8 Medium2024-08-13
CVE-2024-38160 Windows Network Virtualization Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 9.1 Critical2024-08-13
CVE-2024-43168 Unbound: heap-buffer-overflow in unbound — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 4.8 Medium2024-08-08
CVE-2024-7272 FFmpeg swresample.c fill_audiodata heap-based overflow — FFmpeg 6.3 Medium2024-08-08
CVE-2024-7534 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2024-08-06
CVE-2024-6994 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2024-08-06
CVE-2024-7055 FFmpeg pnmdec.c pnm_decode_frame heap-based overflow — FFmpeg 6.3 Medium2024-08-06
CVE-2024-7546 oFono SimToolKit Heap-based Buffer Overflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — oFono 8.4 -2024-08-05
CVE-2024-7545 oFono SimToolKit Heap-based Buffer Overflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — oFono 8.4 -2024-08-05
CVE-2024-7544 oFono SimToolKit Heap-based Buffer Overflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — oFono 8.4 -2024-08-05
CVE-2024-7543 oFono SimToolKit Heap-based Buffer Overflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — oFono 8.4 -2024-08-05
CVE-2024-39392 Adobe Indesign 2024 EPS File Parsing Heap Memory Corruption Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — InDesign Desktop 7.8 High2024-08-02
CVE-2024-6873 Specially crafted request could caused undefined behaviour which may lead to Remote Code Execution. — ClickHouse 8.1 High2024-08-01
CVE-2024-32671 SAMSUNG Escargot 安全漏洞 — Escargot 9.8AICriticalAI2024-07-29
CVE-2024-40764 SonicWALL SonicOS IPSec VPN 安全漏洞 — SonicOS 9.1AICriticalAI2024-07-18
CVE-2024-39518 Junos OS: MX240, MX480, MX960 platforms using MPC10E: Memory leak will be observed when subscribed to a specific subscription on Junos Telemetry Interface — Junos OS 7.5 High2024-07-10
CVE-2024-37310 EVerest has an integer overflow in the "v2g_incoming_v2gtp" function — everest-core 9.1 Critical2024-07-10
CVE-2024-39883 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Delta Electronics CNCSoft-G2 — CNCSoft-G2 8.8AIHighAI2024-07-09
CVE-2024-20781 Adobe Indesign TIF File Parsing Heap Memory Corruption — InDesign Desktop 7.8 High2024-07-09

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) represent 1864 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.