Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1325 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2665

2665 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-4244 Tenda W9 DhcpSetSer fromDhcpSetSer stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4243 Tenda W9 wifiSSIDset formwrlSSIDset stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4242 Tenda W9 wifiSSIDget formwrlSSIDget stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4241 Tenda W9 formQosManageDouble_auto stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4240 Tenda W9 formQosManageDouble_user stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4239 Tenda AX1806 SetRebootTimer formSetRebootTimer stack-based overflow — AX1806 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4238 Tenda AX1806 SetOnlineDevName formSetDeviceName stack-based overflow — AX1806 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4237 Tenda AX1806 execCommand R7WebsSecurityHandler stack-based overflow — AX1806 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4236 Tenda AX1803 SetDDNSCfg formSetSysToolDDNS stack-based overflow — AX1803 8.8 High2024-04-26
CVE-2023-6116 Remote Code Execution without authentication using stack overflow — XRN-420S 8.9 High2024-04-26
CVE-2023-6095 Remote Code Execution without authentication using memory overflow — HRX-1620 8.9 High2024-04-26
CVE-2024-4171 Tenda W30E WizardHandle fromWizardHandle stack-based overflow — W30E 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4170 Tenda 4G300 sub_429A30 stack-based overflow — 4G300 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4169 Tenda 4G300 sub_4279CC stack-based overflow — 4G300 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4168 Tenda 4G300 sub_4260F0 stack-based overflow — 4G300 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4167 Tenda 4G300 sub_422AA4 stack-based overflow — 4G300 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4166 Tenda 4G300 sub_41E858 stack-based overflow — 4G300 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4165 Tenda G3 modifyDhcpRule stack-based overflow — G3 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4164 Tenda G3 ModifyPppAuthWhiteMac formModifyPppAuthWhiteMac stack-based overflow — G3 8.8 High2024-04-25
CVE-2024-4127 Tenda W15E guestWifiRuleRefresh stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4126 Tenda W15E SetSysTimeCfg formSetSysTime stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4125 Tenda W15E setStaticRoute formSetStaticRoute stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4124 Tenda W15E SetRemoteWebManage formSetRemoteWebManage stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4123 Tenda W15E SetPortMapping formSetPortMapping stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4122 Tenda W15E setDebugCfg formSetDebugCfg stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4121 Tenda W15E formQOSRuleDel stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4120 Tenda W15E modifyIpMacBind formIPMacBindModify stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4119 Tenda W15E delIpMacBind formIPMacBindDel stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4118 Tenda W15E addIpMacBind formIPMacBindAdd stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4117 Tenda W15E DelPortMapping formDelPortMapping stack-based overflow — W15E 8.8 High2024-04-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2665 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.