Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-55116 BMC Control-M/Agent buffer overflow local privilege escalation — Control-M/Agent 8.8 High2025-09-16
CVE-2025-10432 Tenda AC1206 HTTP Request AdvSetMacMtuWa check_param_changed stack-based overflow — AC1206 9.8 Critical2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10392 Mercury KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 HTTP Header stack-based overflow — KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 9.8 Critical2025-09-14
CVE-2025-54916 Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-54099 Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.0 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-40795 Siemens SIMATIC PCS neo 安全漏洞 — SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 9.8 Critical2025-09-09
CVE-2025-9938 D-Link DI-8400 yyxz.asp yyxz_dlink_asp stack-based overflow — DI-8400 8.8 High2025-09-03
CVE-2025-9791 Tenda AC20 fromAdvSetMacMtuWan stack-based overflow — AC20 8.8 High2025-09-01
CVE-2025-9748 Tenda CH22 httpd IPSECsave fromIpsecitem stack-based overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-08-31
CVE-2011-10032 Sunway Forcecontrol SNMP NetDBServer.exe Opcode 0x57 — ForceControl 9.8 -2025-08-30
CVE-2009-20008 Green Dam < 3.174 URL Processing Buffer Overflow — Green Dam Youth Escort 8.8 -2025-08-30
CVE-2009-20009 Belkin Bulldog Plus Web Service Buffer Overflow — Bulldog Plus UPS Monitoring Software 9.8 -2025-08-30
CVE-2008-20001 activePDF WebGrabber ActiveX Control Buffer Overflow — WebGrabber 8.8 -2025-08-30
CVE-2025-34165 NetSupport Manager < 14.12.0000 Stack-Based Buffer Overflow — NetSupport Manager 8.2 -2025-08-29
CVE-2025-9605 Tenda AC21/AC23 GetParentControlInfo stack-based overflow — AC21 9.8 Critical2025-08-29
CVE-2025-9527 Linksys E1700 QoSSetup stack-based overflow — E1700 8.8 High2025-08-27
CVE-2025-9526 Linksys E1700 setSysAdm stack-based overflow — E1700 8.8 High2025-08-27
CVE-2025-9525 Linksys E1700 setWan stack-based overflow — E1700 8.8 High2025-08-27
CVE-2025-9523 Tenda AC1206 GetParentControlInfo stack-based overflow — AC1206 9.8 Critical2025-08-27
CVE-2025-9483 Linksys RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE6500/RE7000/RE9000 singlePortForwardAdd stack-based overflow — RE6250 8.8 High2025-08-26
CVE-2025-9482 Linksys RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE6500/RE7000/RE9000 portRangeForwardAdd stack-based overflow — RE6250 8.8 High2025-08-26
CVE-2025-9481 Linksys RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE6500/RE7000/RE9000 setIpv6 stack-based overflow — RE6250 8.8 High2025-08-26
CVE-2025-53418 COMMGR Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability — COMMGR 8.6 High2025-08-26
CVE-2025-54491 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25
CVE-2025-54493 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25
CVE-2025-54494 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25
CVE-2025-54492 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25
CVE-2025-54484 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25
CVE-2025-54483 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25
CVE-2025-54489 libbiosig 安全漏洞 — libbiosig 9.8 Critical2025-08-25

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.