Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2021-1439 Cisco Aironet Access Points FlexConnect Multicast DNS Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco Aironet Access Point Software (IOS XE Controller) 7.4 High2021-03-24
CVE-2021-21051 Adobe Photoshop Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Could Lead To Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Photoshop 7.8 -2021-02-11
CVE-2020-6088 Allen-Bradley Flex IO 安全漏洞 — Allen-Bradley 7.5 -2021-02-04
CVE-2021-3185 gst-plugins-bad 安全漏洞 — gstreamer 9.8 -2021-01-25
CVE-2020-8944 Unchecked buffer overrun in ecall_restore — Asylo 5.3 Medium2020-12-15
CVE-2020-8942 Unchecked buffer overrun in enc_untrusted_read — Asylo 5.3 Medium2020-12-15
CVE-2020-8943 Unchecked buffer overrun in enc_untrusted_recvfrom — Asylo 5.3 Medium2020-12-15
CVE-2020-8941 Unchecked buffer overrun in enc_untrusted_inet_pton — Asylo 5.3 Medium2020-12-15
CVE-2020-8940 Unchecked buffer overrun in enc_untrusted_recvmsg — Asylo 5.3 Medium2020-12-15
CVE-2020-8937 Arbitrary enclave memory location write from untrusted environment — Asylo 5.3 Medium2020-12-15
CVE-2020-27818 Libpng Pngcheck 缓冲区错误漏洞 — pngcheck 3.3 -2020-12-08
CVE-2020-9247 华为缓冲区错误漏洞 — HONOR 20 PRO 7.8 -2020-12-07
CVE-2020-6017 Valvesoftware GameNetworkingSockets 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Game Networking Sockets 9.8 -2020-12-03
CVE-2020-6018 Valvesoftware GameNetworkingSockets 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Game Networking Sockets 9.8 -2020-12-02
CVE-2020-25185 Paradox IP150 缓冲区错误漏洞 — IP150 8.8 -2020-11-21
CVE-2020-7559 Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Control Expert 安全漏洞 — PLC Simulator on EcoStruxureª Control Expert (now Unity Pro) (all versions) 7.5 -2020-11-19
CVE-2020-7564 多款Schneider Electric产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — Web Server on Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum and Modicon Premium Legacy offers and their Communication Modules (see notification for details) 9.8 -2020-11-18
CVE-2020-8261 Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure和Pulse Policy Secure 注入漏洞 — Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure 7.1 -2020-10-28
CVE-2020-8249 Pulse Secure Linux Desktop Client 安全漏洞 — Pulse Secure Desktop Client 7.8 -2020-10-28
CVE-2020-6085 Allen-Bradley Flex IO 安全漏洞 — Allen Bradley 7.5 -2020-10-19
CVE-2020-6084 Allen-Bradley Flex IO 安全漏洞 — Allen-Bradley 7.5 -2020-10-19
CVE-2020-6083 Allen-Bradley Flex IO 安全漏洞 — Allen Bradley 7.5 -2020-10-14
CVE-2020-6087 Allen-Bradley Flex IO 安全漏洞 — Allen Bradley 7.5 -2020-10-14
CVE-2020-6086 Allen-Bradley Flex IO 安全漏洞 — Allen Bradley 7.5 -2020-10-14
CVE-2020-5136 SonicWall SonicOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SonicOS 6.5 -2020-10-12
CVE-2020-5137 SonicWall SonicOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SonicOS 7.5 -2020-10-12
CVE-2020-5135 SonicWall SonicOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SonicOS 9.8 -2020-10-12
CVE-2020-5133 SonicWall SonicOS 安全漏洞 — SonicOS 7.5 -2020-10-12
CVE-2020-14355 红帽 SPICE remote display system 缓冲区错误漏洞 — spice 10.0 -2020-10-07
CVE-2020-14374 Ubuntu DPDK copy_data安全漏洞 — dpdk 8.8 -2020-09-30

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.