Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-37926 Zyxel ATP 安全漏洞 — ATP series firmware 5.5 Medium2023-11-28
CVE-2023-4590 Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Frhed — Frhed 7.3 High2023-11-27
CVE-2023-6238 Kernel: nvme: memory corruption via unprivileged user passthrough — kernel 6.7 Medium2023-11-21
CVE-2023-47217 Arkruntime has a buffer overflow vulnerability — OpenHarmony 4.0 Medium2023-11-20
CVE-2023-39206 Zoom Client 安全漏洞 — Zoom Clients 3.7 Low2023-11-14
CVE-2023-39204 Zoom client 安全漏洞 — Zoom Clients 4.3 Medium2023-11-14
CVE-2023-29177 Fortinet FortiADC 安全漏洞 — FortiDDoS-F 6.2 Medium2023-11-14
CVE-2023-43504 Siemens Comos 安全漏洞 — COMOS 9.6 Critical2023-11-14
CVE-2023-47625 Global Buffer Overflow leading to denial of service in PX4-Autopilot — PX4-Autopilot 2.9 Low2023-11-13
CVE-2023-47610 Telit Cinterion BGS5 安全漏洞 — EHS5 8.1 High2023-11-09
CVE-2023-43577 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43576 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43575 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43573 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43581 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43580 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43579 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43578 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43571 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43569 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-43567 Lenovo Desktops 安全漏洞 — Desktop BIOS 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-5075 Lenovo Bios 安全漏洞 — IdeaPad Duet 3-10IGL5 6.7 Medium2023-11-08
CVE-2023-33055 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Audio — Snapdragon 7.8 High2023-11-07
CVE-2023-33045 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in WLAN Firmware — Snapdragon 9.8 Critical2023-11-07
CVE-2023-33031 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Automotive Audio — Snapdragon 7.8 High2023-11-07
CVE-2023-28570 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input in Audio — Snapdragon 6.7 Medium2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46847 Squid: denial of service in http digest authentication 8.6 High2023-11-03
CVE-2023-3164 Heap-buffer-overflow in extractimagesection() — libtiff 5.5 Medium2023-11-02
CVE-2023-4452 Web Server Buffer Overflow Vulnerability — EDR-810 Series 6.5 Medium2023-11-01
CVE-2023-45797 DreamSecurity MagicLine Buffer Overflow Vulnerability — MagicLine4NX 9.8 Critical2023-10-30

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.