Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1810

1810 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-31225 Lack of size check and buffer overflow in RIOT — RIOT 8.4 High2024-05-01
CVE-2024-1969 Heap buffer overflow — GateManager 8.2 High2024-04-29
CVE-2023-50361 QTS, QuTS hero — QTS 5.0 Medium2024-04-26
CVE-2023-50362 QTS, QuTS hero — QTS 5.0 Medium2024-04-26
CVE-2023-50364 QTS, QuTS hero — QTS 6.4 Medium2024-04-26
CVE-2024-20313 Cisco IOS XE Software 安全漏洞 — Cisco IOS XE Software 7.4 High2024-04-24
CVE-2024-4020 Tenda FH1206 addressNat fromAddressNat buffer overflow — FH1206 8.8 High2024-04-20
CVE-2022-24807 net-snmp: A malformed OID in a SET request to SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmAccessTable can cause an out-of-bounds memory access — net-snmp 6.5 Medium2024-04-16
CVE-2022-24805 net-snmp: A buffer overflow in the handling of the INDEX of NET-SNMP-VACM-MIB can cause an out-of-bounds memory access. — net-snmp 6.5 Medium2024-04-16
CVE-2024-3120 Stack-Buffer Overflow in 'Content-Length' and 'Warning' Header Processing in sngrep — sngrep 9.0 Critical2024-04-09
CVE-2024-3119 Stack-Buffer Overflow in 'Call-ID' and 'X-Call-ID' SIP Header Processing in sngrep — sngrep 9.0 Critical2024-04-09
CVE-2023-50821 Siemens SIMATIC PCS 7 安全漏洞 — SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.1 6.2 Medium2024-04-09
CVE-2023-52364 Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 9.8AICriticalAI2024-04-08
CVE-2023-52551 Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 5.5AIMediumAI2024-04-08
CVE-2023-52550 Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 5.5AIMediumAI2024-04-08
CVE-2023-52549 Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 5.5AIMediumAI2024-04-08
CVE-2024-27908 Lenovo printers 安全漏洞 — Printers 4.9 Medium2024-04-05
CVE-2023-6948 DJI Mavic和Matrice 安全漏洞 — Mavic 3 Pro 3.0 Low2024-04-02
CVE-2024-21463 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Audio — Snapdragon 7.3 High2024-04-01
CVE-2023-43515 Buffer copy without checking size of input (Classic buffer overflow) in HLOS — Snapdragon 6.6 Medium2024-04-01
CVE-2023-33023 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (`Classic Buffer Overflow`) in SPS-Applications — Snapdragon 8.4 High2024-04-01
CVE-2023-28547 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in SPS Applications — Snapdragon 8.4 High2024-04-01
CVE-2024-2452 Integer wraparound, under-allocation, and heap buffer overflow in Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo __portable_aligned_alloc() — ThreadX 7.0 High2024-03-26
CVE-2023-6175 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') in Wireshark — Wireshark 7.8 High2024-03-26
CVE-2024-29195 Azure C SDK Integer Wraparound Vulnerability — azure-c-shared-utility 6.0 Medium2024-03-26
CVE-2015-10123 Wago: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input in wbm of multiple products — Controller BACnet/IP 8.8 High2024-03-13
CVE-2024-22039 Siemens 多款产品安全漏洞 — Cerberus PRO EN Engineering Tool 10.0 Critical2024-03-12
CVE-2024-2331 SourceCodester Tourist Reservation System System.cpp ad_writedata buffer overflow — Tourist Reservation System 6.3 Medium2024-03-09
CVE-2023-43548 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Video — Snapdragon 7.3 High2024-03-04
CVE-2023-43540 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Bluetooth HOST — Snapdragon 8.4 High2024-03-04

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1810 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.