Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1804

1804 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-9627 UTT HiPER 1200GW Web Management setSysAdm strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1200GW 8.8 High2026-05-27
CVE-2026-7454 WRL File Parsing Memory Corruption in Autodesk 3ds Max — 3ds Max 7.8 High2026-05-26
CVE-2026-7452 WRL File Parsing Memory Corruption in Autodesk 3ds Max — 3ds Max 7.8 High2026-05-26
CVE-2018-25377 Flash Slideshow Maker Professional 5.20 Buffer Overflow SEH — Flash Slideshow Maker Professional 8.4 High2026-05-25
CVE-2018-25376 Socusoft 3GP Photo Slideshow 8.05 Buffer Overflow SEH — 3GP Photo Slideshow 8.4 High2026-05-25
CVE-2018-25369 Visual Ping 0.8.0.0 Buffer Overflow Denial of Service — Visual Ping 6.2 Medium2026-05-25
CVE-2018-25367 NASA openVSP 3.16.1 Denial of Service via Buffer Overflow — openVSP 6.2 Medium2026-05-25
CVE-2018-25366 CuteFTP 5.0 XP Buffer Overflow via Site Manager Label Field — CuteFTP 8.4 High2026-05-25
CVE-2026-9443 Edimax BR-6478AC POST Request formL2TPSetup buffer overflow — BR-6478AC 8.8 High2026-05-25
CVE-2026-9442 Edimax BR-6478AC POST Request formiNICSiteSurvey buffer overflow — BR-6478AC 8.8 High2026-05-25
CVE-2026-9403 Edimax BR-6675nD POST Request formWlSiteSurvey buffer overflow — BR-6675nD 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9401 Edimax BR-6675nD POST Request formWanTcpipSetup buffer overflow — BR-6675nD 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9399 Edimax BR-6675nD POST Request formsetPPPoE buffer overflow — BR-6675nD 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9393 H3C Magic B0 aspForm Edit_BasicSSID_5G buffer overflow — Magic B0 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9389 Tenda F456 L7Im frmL7ImForm buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9382 Edimax BR-6675nD POST Request formPPTPSetup buffer overflow — BR-6675nD 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9381 Edimax BR-6675nD POST Request formPPPoESetup buffer overflow — BR-6675nD 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9380 Edimax BR-6675nD POST Request formL2TPSetup buffer overflow — BR-6675nD 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9360 Edimax EW-7438RPn POST Request formwlencrypt24g buffer overflow — EW-7438RPn 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9346 Edimax EW-7438RPn webs formWirelessTbl buffer overflow — EW-7438RPn 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2026-9345 Edimax EW-7438RPn webs formWizSurvey buffer overflow — EW-7438RPn 8.8 High2026-05-24
CVE-2018-25356 SIPp 3.6 Local Buffer Overflow via Command-line Arguments — SIPp 8.4 High2026-05-23
CVE-2018-25355 Audiograbber 1.83 Local Buffer Overflow via SEH — Audiograbber 8.4 High2026-05-23
CVE-2018-25345 10-Strike Network Scanner 3.0 Local Buffer Overflow SEH — Network Scanner 8.4 High2026-05-23
CVE-2026-9295 Edimax BR-6428NS POST Request formWirelessTbl buffer overflow — BR-6428NS 8.8 High2026-05-23
CVE-2026-9294 Edimax BR-6428NS POST Request formWanTcpipSetup buffer overflow — BR-6428NS 8.8 High2026-05-23
CVE-2026-8776 Edimax BR-6428NS POST Request formPPTPSetup buffer overflow — BR-6428NS 8.8 High2026-05-18
CVE-2026-8775 Edimax BR-6428NS POST Request formL2TPSetup buffer overflow — BR-6428NS 8.8 High2026-05-18
CVE-2026-8764 H3C Magic B3 aspForm UpdateWanParams buffer overflow — Magic B3 7.2 High2026-05-17
CVE-2018-25328 VX Search 10.6.18 Local Buffer Overflow via Directory Field — VX Search 8.4 High2026-05-17

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1804 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.