IBM Db2 Federated Query Logic DoS Vulnerability (CVE-2025-14689)

Thinking Process: 1. Analyze the Request: Task: Translate a Chinese vulnerability intelligence summary to English. Role: Professional translator specializing in cybersecurity. Constraint 1: Maintain all Markdown formatting intact. Constraint 2: Do not add any introductory or concluding remarks. Input: A Markdown-formatted text about an IBM Db2 vulnerability (CVE-2025-14689). 2. Analyze the Input Text: Header: (Vulnerability Key Information) Section 1: (Summary) Content: IBM Db2 联邦服务器可能允许经过身份验证的用户由于在使用联邦对象的数据查询逻辑中对特殊元素的不正确中和而导致服务拒绝。 (IBM Db2 Federated Server may allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in data query logic using federated objects.) Section 2: (Vulnerability Details) CVEID: CVE-2025-14689 描述 (Description): Similar to summary but specifies Linux, UNIX, Windows (including Db2 Connect Server). CVSS 基本分数 (CVSS Base Score): 6.5 CVSS 向量 (CVSS Vector): (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) Section 3: (Affected Products and Versions) Table: Product, Version, Applicable Version. Note 1: Unix affected. Linux and Windows not affected. (Wait, the description says Linux, UNIX, Windows may allow, but the note says Unix affected, Linux/Windows not. This is a contradiction in the source text, but as a translator, I should translate faithfully, perhaps noting the nuance if possible, but usually, direct translation is safer unless I'm sure it's an error. Looking closely: "IBM Db2 for Linux、UNIX 和 Windows（包括 Db2 Connect Server）可能允许..." vs "Unix 受影响。Linux 和 Windows 不受影响。". This looks like a specific advisory nuance where the general product line is mentioned but specific OSes are clarified later. I will translate exactly what is written.) Note 2: Older versions (11.1, 10.5, etc.) may also be affected but are unsupported. Section 4: (Remediation) Content: Customers can download special builds containing interim fixes based on latest levels (V12.1.2 and V12.1.3). Section 5: (Workarounds and Mitigations) Content: 无 (None) Section 6: (Additional Information) Content: Subscribe to My Notifications, references to CVSS v3, IBM Security Engineering website, etc. 3. Drafting the Translation (Iterative Process): -> (Or . "Key Information" is standard for "关键信息".) -> "IBM Db2 Federated Server may allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in data query logic when using federated objects." Refinement: "IBM Db2 Federated Server may allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in the data query logic used with federated objects." -> -> -> -> -> Table headers: -> Table row: Note 1: -> Note 2: -> -> (Or . "Remediation" is more professional in cybersecurity context.) -> -> -> -> -> -> 4. Review and Refine: Check Markdown syntax (headers, bold, tables, lists). Ensure terminology is standard (e.g., "Denial of Service", "Authenticated User", "Interim Fix", "Special Build"). Check the contradiction in the source text regarding OS support (Description says Linux/UNIX/Windows, Note says only Unix). As a translator, I must translate the source text faithfully, even if the source contains internal inconsistencies. I will translate the note exactly as written. "特殊构建" -> "Special builds" (Common IBM terminology). "临时修复" -> "Interim fixes". "中和" -> "Neutralization" (Standard CWE terminology). "联邦对象" -> "Federated objects". 5. Final Polish: Ensure no extra text is added. Ensure Markdown table structure is preserved. Self-Correction on Table: The input table has a specific structure. I need to make sure the pipe alignment looks good, though Markdown parsers handle it. I will keep the structure identical. Self-Correction on "Applicable Version": The Chinese says "适用版本" with value "Server". This likely means "Server" edition. I will translate as "Applicable Version". Self-Correction on "My Notifications": This is likely a proper noun for an IBM service, so keep capitalization. Self-Correction on "CVSS Vector": Keep the string exactly as is. Self-Correction on "Unix" vs "UNIX": The source uses "Unix" in the note and "UNIX" in the description. I should preserve the casing as per the source text to be accurate to the input, even if standard is UNIX. Wait, looking at the source: "UNIX 和 Windows" (Description), "Unix 受影响" (Note). I will translate "UNIX" as "UNIX" and "Unix" as "Unix" to match the source fidelity, or standardise to "UNIX" if it's clearly a typo. Given it's a translation task, fidelity is key. I will use "UNIX" for the description part and "Unix" for the note part to match the source text's variation, or standardise to "UNIX" for consistency? Usually, in security advisories, "UNIX" is the standard trademark. However, the source text explicitly writes "Unix" in the note. I will translate "Unix" as "Unix" to be faithful to the provided text, but "UNIX" as "UNIX". Actually, looking at the context, it's likely a typo in the original Chine

Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

IBM Db2 Federated Query Logic DoS Vulnerability (CVE-2025-14689)