目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1325

100%

CVE-2026-42768— OpenSSL 安全漏洞

AI 预测 5.9 利用难度: 理论可行 EPSS 0.35% · P27

可能的 ATT&CK 技术 1AI

T1408.002

影响版本矩阵 4

厂商产品版本范围状态
OpenSSLOpenSSL4.0.0< 4.0.1affected
3.6.0< 3.6.3affected
3.5.0< 3.5.7affected
3.4.0< 3.4.6affected
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-42768 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt()
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Description
Issue summary: The CMS_decrypt and PKCS7_decrypt functions are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher-style attack when an attacker is able to provide the CMS or S/MIME messages and observe the error code and/or decryption output. Impact summary: The Bleichenbacher-style attack allows an attacker to use the victim's vulnerable application as a way to decrypt or sign messages with the victim's private RSA key. The attack is possible in 2 variants. 1. The decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is used without providing the recipient certificate. In this case OpenSSL iterates over every KeyTransRecipientInfo (KTRI) without stopping at the first success. An attacker who authors a message with two KTRI entries — the first one wrapping a real CEK under the victim's public key, the second with an arbitrary probe ciphertext — obtains opportunity to iterate the 2nd KTRI to get a valid PKCS#1 v1.5 padding if the error code of the application is available. That is a Bleichenbacher oracle (Bleichenbacher, CRYPTO '98): an adaptive-chosen-ciphertext side channel from which the attacker decrypts any RSA ciphertext to the victim's key or forges any PKCS#1 v1.5 signature under it. 2. When the decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is provided with the recipient certificate, and the recipient is not found, a random key is substituted. An attacker who authors a message and is able to compare both error code and the result of the decryption, can mount a Bleichenbacher oracle. We are not aware of any applications that provide a remote attacker an opportunity to mount an attack described in these scenarios. We consider the existence of such application very unlikely, and for this reason this CVE has been evaluated as Low severity. To avoid these attacks, when RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 Key Transport is in use, the invoked EVP_PKEY_decrypt() will use the implicit rejection mechanism described in draft-irtf-cfrg-rsa-guidance. In previous OpenSSL releases the implicit rejection was explicitly disabled. The implicit rejection mechanism always returns a plaintext value, the symmetric key. This result is deterministic for the ciphertext and the private key. The length of the decryption result can happen to match the length of the key of the symmetric cipher that was used for the content encryption. When a certificate is not provided, the last RecipientInfo producing a key that looks valid will be used. It may cause getting garbage content on decryption. As a proper way to deal with this a recipient certificate has to be provided to identify the particular RecipientInfo for decryption. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are not affected by this issue, as CMS and S/MIME processing happens outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Type
隐蔽通道
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Title
OpenSSL 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
OpenSSL是OpenSSL团队的一个开源的能够实现安全套接层(SSLv2/v3)和安全传输层(TLSv1)协议的通用加密库。该产品支持多种加密算法,包括对称密码、哈希算法、安全散列算法等。 OpenSSL存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于CMS_decrypt和PKCS7_decrypt函数易受Bleichenbacher风格攻击,可能导致解密或签名消息。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD

受影响产品

厂商产品影响版本CPE订阅
OpenSSLOpenSSL 4.0.0 ~ 4.0.1 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-42768 的公开POC

#POC 描述源链接神龙链接
AI 生成 POC高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-42768 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-42768 补丁与修复 (4)

CVE-2026-42768 厂商安全公告 (1)

同批安全公告 · OpenSSL · 2026-06-09 · 共 18 条

CVE-2026-45445OpenSSL 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-34183OpenSSL 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-34181OpenSSL 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-34180OpenSSL 缓冲区错误漏洞
CVE-2026-34182OpenSSL 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-9076OpenSSL 缓冲区错误漏洞
CVE-2026-35188OpenSSL 资源管理错误漏洞
CVE-2026-7383OpenSSL 缓冲区错误漏洞
CVE-2026-45446OpenSSL 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-42771OpenSSL 缓冲区错误漏洞
CVE-2026-45447OpenSSL 资源管理错误漏洞
CVE-2026-42769OpenSSL 信任管理问题漏洞
CVE-2026-42767OpenSSL 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2026-42766OpenSSL 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2026-42764OpenSSL 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2026-42770OpenSSL 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-42765OpenSSL 代码问题漏洞

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-42768

暂无评论


发表评论