Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-42015— Gnutls: gnutls: memory corruption due to off-by-one error in pkcs#12 bag handling

CVSS 5.3 · Medium EPSS 0.14% · P34

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1AI

T1190 · Exploit Public-Facing Application

Affected Version Matrix 8

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10anyaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6anyunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7anyaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 80:3.6.16-8.el8_10.6< *unaffected
0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.6< *unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9anyaffected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imagesanyaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4anyaffected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-42015

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
Gnutls: gnutls: memory corruption due to off-by-one error in pkcs#12 bag handling
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in the PKCS#12 bag element bounds check. This vulnerability allows an remote attacker to write past the internal array of a PKCS#12 bag when appending to a bag that already contains 32 elements. This memory corruption could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or potentially other unspecified impacts.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
Off-by-one错误
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
GnuTLS 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
GnuTLS是GnuTLS开源的一款免费的用于实现SSL、TLS和DTLS协议的安全通信库。 GnuTLS存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于PKCS#12包元素边界检查中存在差一错误,可能导致远程攻击者写入数组越界,造成内存损坏。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8 0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.6 ~ * cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8 0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.6 ~ * cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10-cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6-cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7-cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9-cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Images-cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4-cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-42015

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-42015

登录查看更多情报信息。

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-42015 (2)

Other References for CVE-2026-42015 (1)

Same Patch Batch · Red Hat · 2026-05-26 · 7 CVEs total

CVE-2026-73749.9 CRITICALKubevirt: kubevirt virt-handler: privilege escalation and node compromise via symlink foll
CVE-2026-44808.5 HIGHSamba: samba: remote code execution in printing subsystem via unescaped job description
CVE-2026-420138.2 HIGHGnutls: gnutls: certificate validation bypass due to oversized subject alternative name
CVE-2026-52608.2 HIGHGnutls: gnutls: information disclosure via heap overread in rsa key exchange
CVE-2026-488647.8 HIGHLibsolv: heap buffer overflow in libsolv repopagestore via unchecked decompression of mali
CVE-2026-420127.1 HIGHGnutls: gnutls: certificate validation bypass due to improper handling of uri and srv sans

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-42015

No comments yet


Leave a comment