Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2026-31707— ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg()

CVSS 7.1 · High EPSS 0.01% · P2

Affected Version Matrix 10

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
LinuxLinux0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf< 7dd0c858e1909769a4c91842724315ee74f1a5f1affected
0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf< 299db777ea0cfa5c407e41b045c24a14c034c27baffected
0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf< 99c631d0366c1eab8fb188fe66425f4581ebdde4affected
0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf< d6a6aa81eac2c9bff66dc6e191179cb69a14426baffected
5.15affected
< 5.15unaffected
6.12.84≤ 6.12.*unaffected
6.18.25≤ 6.18.*unaffected
… +2 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-31707

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg()
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() ipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int arithmetic. Three cases can overflow: KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp->ngroups * sizeof(gid_t); resp->payload_sz is __u32 and resp->ngroups is __s32. Each addition can wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes signed and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX before the multiply. A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to equal entry->msg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and downstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp->payload_sz, kmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext->ngroups) then trust the unverified length. Use check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST paths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional payload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte chunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is unworkable on the response side. For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject resp->ngroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and report the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC boundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition stay well below UINT_MAX. The now-redundant ngroups check and pr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed. This is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 ("ksmbd: fix integer overflows on 32 bit systems"), which hardened the request side.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于ipc_validate_msg()中消息大小计算使用无符号整数算术可能溢出,可能导致绕过大小验证。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux 0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf ~ 7dd0c858e1909769a4c91842724315ee74f1a5f1 -
LinuxLinux 5.15 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-31707

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-31707

登录查看更多情报信息。
Patch · 4

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-05-01 · 146 CVEs total

CVE-2026-430119.8 CRITICALnet/x25: Fix potential double free of skb
CVE-2026-430379.8 CRITICALip6_tunnel: clear skb2->cb[] in ip4ip6_err()
CVE-2026-317059.8 CRITICALksmbd: fix out-of-bounds write in smb2_get_ea() EA alignment
CVE-2026-430389.8 CRITICALipv6: icmp: clear skb2->cb[] in ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach()
CVE-2026-430399.8 CRITICALnet: ti: icssg-prueth: fix missing data copy and wrong recycle in ZC RX dispatch
CVE-2026-317189.8 CRITICALksmbd: fix use-after-free in __ksmbd_close_fd() via durable scavenger
CVE-2026-430188.8 HIGHBluetooth: hci_event: fix potential UAF in hci_le_remote_conn_param_req_evt
CVE-2026-317738.8 HIGHBluetooth: SMP: derive legacy responder STK authentication from MITM state
CVE-2026-317398.8 HIGHcrypto: tegra - Add missing CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC
CVE-2026-317358.8 HIGHiommupt: Fix short gather if the unmap goes into a large mapping
CVE-2026-317178.8 HIGHksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect
CVE-2026-430488.8 HIGHHID: core: Mitigate potential OOB by removing bogus memset()
CVE-2026-317098.8 HIGHsmb: client: validate the whole DACL before rewriting it in cifsacl
CVE-2026-317068.8 HIGHksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl()
CVE-2026-317128.3 HIGHksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl()
CVE-2026-317718.1 HIGHBluetooth: hci_event: move wake reason storage into validated event handlers
CVE-2026-317798.1 HIGHwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix potential out-of-bounds read in iwl_mvm_nd_match_info_handler()
CVE-2026-430518.1 HIGHHID: wacom: fix out-of-bounds read in wacom_intuos_bt_irq
CVE-2026-317088.1 HIGHsmb: client: fix OOB read in smb2_ioctl_query_info QUERY_INFO path
CVE-2026-316957.8 HIGHwifi: virt_wifi: remove SET_NETDEV_DEV to avoid use-after-free

Showing top 20 of 146 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-31707

No comments yet


Leave a comment