Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2026-31465— writeback: don't block sync for filesystems with no data integrity guarantees

EPSS 0.01% · P2
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-31465

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
writeback: don't block sync for filesystems with no data integrity guarantees
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: writeback: don't block sync for filesystems with no data integrity guarantees Add a SB_I_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY superblock flag for filesystems that cannot guarantee data persistence on sync (eg fuse). For superblocks with this flag set, sync kicks off writeback of dirty inodes but does not wait for the flusher threads to complete the writeback. This replaces the per-inode AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mapping flag added in commit f9a49aa302a0 ("fs/writeback: skip AS_NO_DATA_INTEGRITY mappings in wait_sb_inodes()"). The flag belongs at the superblock level because data integrity is a filesystem-wide property, not a per-inode one. Having this flag at the superblock level also allows us to skip having to iterate every dirty inode in wait_sb_inodes() only to skip each inode individually. Prior to this commit, mappings with no data integrity guarantees skipped waiting on writeback completion but still waited on the flusher threads to finish initiating the writeback. Waiting on the flusher threads is unnecessary. This commit kicks off writeback but does not wait on the flusher threads. This change properly addresses a recent report [1] for a suspend-to-RAM hang seen on fuse-overlayfs that was caused by waiting on the flusher threads to finish: Workqueue: pm_fs_sync pm_fs_sync_work_fn Call Trace: <TASK> __schedule+0x457/0x1720 schedule+0x27/0xd0 wb_wait_for_completion+0x97/0xe0 sync_inodes_sb+0xf8/0x2e0 __iterate_supers+0xdc/0x160 ksys_sync+0x43/0xb0 pm_fs_sync_work_fn+0x17/0xa0 process_one_work+0x193/0x350 worker_thread+0x1a1/0x310 kthread+0xfc/0x240 ret_from_fork+0x243/0x280 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> On fuse this is problematic because there are paths that may cause the flusher thread to block (eg if systemd freezes the user session cgroups first, which freezes the fuse daemon, before invoking the kernel suspend. The kernel suspend triggers ->write_node() which on fuse issues a synchronous setattr request, which cannot be processed since the daemon is frozen. Or if the daemon is buggy and cannot properly complete writeback, initiating writeback on a dirty folio already under writeback leads to writeback_get_folio() -> folio_prepare_writeback() -> unconditional wait on writeback to finish, which will cause a hang). This commit restores fuse to its prior behavior before tmp folios were removed, where sync was essentially a no-op. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAJnrk1a-asuvfrbKXbEwwDSctvemF+6zfhdnuzO65Pt8HsFSRw@mail.gmail.com/T/#m632c4648e9cafc4239299887109ebd880ac6c5c1
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于同步操作不当,可能导致无法保证数据持久性的文件系统在同步时被阻塞。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux 0c58a97f919c24fe4245015f4375a39ff05665b6 ~ 83800f8ef358ea2fc9b1ae4986b83f2bc24be927 -
LinuxLinux 6.16 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-31465

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-31465

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-04-22 · 100 CVEs total

CVE-2026-314789.8 CRITICALksmbd: replace hardcoded hdr2_len with offsetof() in smb2_calc_max_out_buf_len()
CVE-2026-314639.8 CRITICALiomap: fix invalid folio access when i_blkbits differs from I/O granularity
CVE-2026-314449.8 CRITICALksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock()
CVE-2026-314369.8 CRITICALdmaengine: idxd: fix possible wrong descriptor completion in llist_abort_desc()
CVE-2026-315019.8 CRITICALnet: ti: icssg-prueth: fix use-after-free of CPPI descriptor in RX path
CVE-2026-314489.4 CRITICALext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data
CVE-2026-314508.8 HIGHext4: publish jinode after initialization
CVE-2026-314328.8 HIGHksmbd: fix OOB write in QUERY_INFO for compound requests
CVE-2026-314338.8 HIGHksmbd: fix potencial OOB in get_file_all_info() for compound requests
CVE-2026-314358.8 HIGHnetfs: Fix read abandonment during retry
CVE-2026-314768.2 HIGHksmbd: do not expire session on binding failure
CVE-2026-314648.1 HIGHscsi: ibmvfc: Fix OOB access in ibmvfc_discover_targets_done()
CVE-2026-315138.1 HIGHBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in l2cap_ecred_conn_req
CVE-2026-314887.8 HIGHdrm/amd/display: Do not skip unrelated mode changes in DSC validation
CVE-2026-314947.8 HIGHnet: macb: use the current queue number for stats
CVE-2026-314547.8 HIGHxfs: save ailp before dropping the AIL lock in push callbacks
CVE-2026-315027.8 HIGHteam: fix header_ops type confusion with non-Ethernet ports
CVE-2026-314797.8 HIGHdrm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next
CVE-2026-315047.8 HIGHnet: fix fanout UAF in packet_release() via NETDEV_UP race
CVE-2026-315057.8 HIGHiavf: fix out-of-bounds writes in iavf_get_ethtool_stats()

Showing top 20 of 100 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-31465

No comments yet


Leave a comment