目標達成 すべての支援者に感謝 — 100%達成しました!

目標: 1000 CNY · 調達済み: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2026-2673— OpenSSL 安全漏洞

EPSS 0.02% · P5
新しい脆弱性情報の通知を購読するログインして購読

I. CVE-2026-2673の基本情報

脆弱性情報

脆弱性についてご質問がありますか?Shenlongの分析が参考になるかご確認ください!
Shenlongの10の質問を表示 ↗

高度な大規模言語モデル技術を使用していますが、出力には不正確または古い情報が含まれる可能性があります。Shenlongはデータの正確性を確保するよう努めていますが、実際の状況に基づいて検証・判断してください。

脆弱性タイトル
OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group
ソース: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性説明
Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.
ソース: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS情報
N/A
ソース: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性タイプ
在会话协商时选择低安全性的算法(算法降级)
ソース: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性タイトル
OpenSSL 安全漏洞
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性説明
OpenSSL是OpenSSL团队的一个开源的能够实现安全套接层(SSLv2/v3)和安全传输层(TLSv1)协议的通用加密库。该产品支持多种加密算法,包括对称密码、哈希算法、安全散列算法等。 OpenSSL 3.6版本和3.5版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于配置使用DEFAULT关键字时存在缺陷,可能导致客户端和服务器无法协商相互支持的密钥交换组。
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS情報
N/A
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性タイプ
N/A
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

影響を受ける製品

ベンダープロダクト影響を受けるバージョンCPE購読
OpenSSLOpenSSL 3.6.0 ~ 3.6.2 -

II. CVE-2026-2673の公開POC

#POC説明ソースリンクShenlongリンク
AI生成POCプレミアム

公開POCは見つかりませんでした。

ログインしてAI POCを生成

III. CVE-2026-2673のインテリジェンス情報

登录查看更多情报信息。

IV. 関連脆弱性

V. CVE-2026-2673へのコメント

まだコメントはありません


コメントを残す