Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2025-40027— net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled

EPSS 0.09% · P25
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2025-40027

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled Syzkaller reports a KASAN issue as below: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c0000000021: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000108-0xdead00000000010f] CPU: 0 PID: 5083 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.134-syzkaller-00037-g855bd1d7d838 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__list_del include/linux/list.h:114 [inline] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:137 [inline] RIP: 0010:list_del include/linux/list.h:148 [inline] RIP: 0010:p9_fd_cancelled+0xe9/0x200 net/9p/trans_fd.c:734 Call Trace: <TASK> p9_client_flush+0x351/0x440 net/9p/client.c:614 p9_client_rpc+0xb6b/0xc70 net/9p/client.c:734 p9_client_version net/9p/client.c:920 [inline] p9_client_create+0xb51/0x1240 net/9p/client.c:1027 v9fs_session_init+0x1f0/0x18f0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:408 v9fs_mount+0xba/0xcb0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:126 legacy_get_tree+0x108/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:632 vfs_get_tree+0x8e/0x300 fs/super.c:1573 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3056 [inline] path_mount+0x6a6/0x1e90 fs/namespace.c:3386 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3399 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3607 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3584 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x283/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3584 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 This happens because of a race condition between: - The 9p client sending an invalid flush request and later cleaning it up; - The 9p client in p9_read_work() canceled all pending requests. Thread 1 Thread 2 ... p9_client_create() ... p9_fd_create() ... p9_conn_create() ... // start Thread 2 INIT_WORK(&m->rq, p9_read_work); p9_read_work() ... p9_client_rpc() ... ... p9_conn_cancel() ... spin_lock(&m->req_lock); ... p9_fd_cancelled() ... ... spin_unlock(&m->req_lock); // status rewrite p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR) // first remove list_del(&req->req_list); ... spin_lock(&m->req_lock) ... // second remove list_del(&req->req_list); spin_unlock(&m->req_lock) ... Commit 74d6a5d56629 ("9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in p9_fd_cancelled/p9_read_work") fixes a concurrency issue in the 9p filesystem client where the req_list could be deleted simultaneously by both p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled functions, but for the case where req->status equals REQ_STATUS_RCVD. Update the check for req->status in p9_fd_cancelled to skip processing not just received requests, but anything that is not SENT, as whatever changed the state from SENT also removed the request from its list. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller. [updated the check from status == RECV || status == ERROR to status != SENT]
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于net/9p组件中存在双重请求释放,可能导致内存损坏。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux afd8d65411551839b7ab14a539d00075b2793451 ~ a5901a0dfb5964525990106706ae8b98db098226 -
LinuxLinux 3.15 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2025-40027

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2025-40027

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2025-10-28 · 58 CVEs total

CVE-2025-40064smc: Fix use-after-free in __pnet_find_base_ndev().
CVE-2025-40075tcp_metrics: use dst_dev_net_rcu()
CVE-2025-40078bpf: Explicitly check accesses to bpf_sock_addr
CVE-2025-40079riscv, bpf: Sign extend struct ops return values properly
CVE-2025-40077f2fs: fix to avoid overflow while left shift operation
CVE-2025-40081perf: arm_spe: Prevent overflow in PERF_IDX2OFF()
CVE-2025-40068fs: ntfs3: Fix integer overflow in run_unpack()
CVE-2025-40067fs/ntfs3: reject index allocation if $BITMAP is empty but blocks exist
CVE-2025-40066wifi: mt76: mt7996: Check phy before init msta_link in mt7996_mac_sta_add_links()
CVE-2025-40065RISC-V: KVM: Write hgatp register with valid mode bits
CVE-2025-40069drm/msm: Fix obj leak in VM_BIND error path
CVE-2025-40063crypto: comp - Use same definition of context alloc and free ops
CVE-2025-40062crypto: hisilicon/qm - set NULL to qm->debug.qm_diff_regs
CVE-2025-40061RDMA/rxe: Fix race in do_task() when draining
CVE-2025-40060coresight: trbe: Return NULL pointer for allocation failures
CVE-2025-40058iommu/vt-d: Disallow dirty tracking if incoherent page walk
CVE-2025-40059coresight: Fix incorrect handling for return value of devm_kzalloc
CVE-2025-40057ptp: Add a upper bound on max_vclocks
CVE-2025-40056vhost: vringh: Fix copy_to_iter return value check
CVE-2025-40055ocfs2: fix double free in user_cluster_connect()

Showing top 20 of 58 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2025-40027

No comments yet


Leave a comment