目標達成 すべての支援者に感謝 — 100%達成しました!

目標: 1000 CNY · 調達済み: 1336 CNY

100%

CVE-2024-5535— OpenSSL 安全漏洞

AI Predicted 5.3 Difficulty: Theoretical EPSS 5.58% · P92

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1AI

T1530 · Data from Cloud Storage

Affected Version Matrix 6

ベンダープロダクトVersion Rangeステータス
OpenSSLOpenSSL3.3.0< 3.3.2affected
3.2.0< 3.2.3affected
3.1.0< 3.1.7affected
3.0.0< 3.0.15affected
1.1.1< 1.1.1zaaffected
1.0.2< 1.0.2zkaffected
新しい脆弱性情報の通知を購読するログインして購読

I. CVE-2024-5535の基本情報

脆弱性情報

脆弱性についてご質問がありますか?Shenlongの分析が参考になるかご確認ください!
Shenlongの10の質問を表示 ↗

高度な大規模言語モデル技術を使用していますが、出力には不正確または古い情報が含まれる可能性があります。Shenlongはデータの正確性を確保するよう努めていますが、実際の状況に基づいて検証・判断してください。

脆弱性タイトル
SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
脆弱性説明
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS情報
N/A
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
脆弱性タイプ
跨界内存读
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
脆弱性タイトル
OpenSSL 安全漏洞
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性説明
OpenSSL是OpenSSL团队的一个开源的能够实现安全套接层(SSLv2/v3)和安全传输层(TLSv1)协议的通用加密库。该产品支持多种加密算法,包括对称密码、哈希算法、安全散列算法等。 OpenSSL 3.3.2之前、3.2.3之前、3.1.7 之前、3.0.15 之前、1.1.1za之前版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于使用空的支持客户端协议缓冲区调用 OpenSSL API 函数 SSL_select_next_proto 可能会导致崩溃。
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS情報
N/A
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性タイプ
N/A
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

影響を受ける製品

ベンダープロダクト影響を受けるバージョンCPE購読
OpenSSLOpenSSL 3.3.0 ~ 3.3.2 -

II. CVE-2024-5535の公開POC

#POC説明ソースリンクShenlongリンク
1PoC - OpenSSL NPN Buffer Overreadhttps://github.com/websecnl/CVE-2024-5535POC詳細
AI生成POCプレミアム

公開POCは見つかりませんでした。

ログインしてAI POCを生成

III. CVE-2024-5535のインテリジェンス情報

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2024-5535 补丁与修复 (4)

CVE-2024-5535 厂商安全公告 (1)

CVE-2024-5535 邮件列表归档 (2)

CVE-2024-5535 其他参考 (2)

IV. 関連脆弱性

V. CVE-2024-5535へのコメント

まだコメントはありません


コメントを残す