Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2024-49998— net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence

EPSS 0.01% · P1
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2024-49998

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence Alexander Sverdlin presents 2 problems during shutdown with the lan9303 driver. One is specific to lan9303 and the other just happens to reproduce there. The first problem is that lan9303 is unique among DSA drivers in that it calls dev_get_drvdata() at "arbitrary runtime" (not probe, not shutdown, not remove): phy_state_machine() -> ... -> dsa_user_phy_read() -> ds->ops->phy_read() -> lan9303_phy_read() -> chip->ops->phy_read() -> lan9303_mdio_phy_read() -> dev_get_drvdata() But we never stop the phy_state_machine(), so it may continue to run after dsa_switch_shutdown(). Our common pattern in all DSA drivers is to set drvdata to NULL to suppress the remove() method that may come afterwards. But in this case it will result in an NPD. The second problem is that the way in which we set dp->conduit->dsa_ptr = NULL; is concurrent with receive packet processing. dsa_switch_rcv() checks once whether dev->dsa_ptr is NULL, but afterwards, rather than continuing to use that non-NULL value, dev->dsa_ptr is dereferenced again and again without NULL checks: dsa_conduit_find_user() and many other places. In between dereferences, there is no locking to ensure that what was valid once continues to be valid. Both problems have the common aspect that closing the conduit interface solves them. In the first case, dev_close(conduit) triggers the NETDEV_GOING_DOWN event in dsa_user_netdevice_event() which closes user ports as well. dsa_port_disable_rt() calls phylink_stop(), which synchronously stops the phylink state machine, and ds->ops->phy_read() will thus no longer call into the driver after this point. In the second case, dev_close(conduit) should do this, as per Documentation/networking/driver.rst: | Quiescence | ---------- | | After the ndo_stop routine has been called, the hardware must | not receive or transmit any data. All in flight packets must | be aborted. If necessary, poll or wait for completion of | any reset commands. So it should be sufficient to ensure that later, when we zeroize conduit->dsa_ptr, there will be no concurrent dsa_switch_rcv() call on this conduit. The addition of the netif_device_detach() function is to ensure that ioctls, rtnetlinks and ethtool requests on the user ports no longer propagate down to the driver - we're no longer prepared to handle them. The race condition actually did not exist when commit 0650bf52b31f ("net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown") first introduced dsa_switch_shutdown(). It was created later, when we stopped unregistering the user interfaces from a bad spot, and we just replaced that sequence with a racy zeroization of conduit->dsa_ptr (one which doesn't ensure that the interfaces aren't up).
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于net子系统中的dsa驱动在关闭时的不当处理,可能导致竞争条件和内核崩溃。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux ff45899e732e57088985e3a497b1d9100571c0f5 ~ 87bd909a7014e32790e8c759d5b7694a95778ca5 -
LinuxLinux 5.17 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2024-49998

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2024-49998

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2024-10-21 · 372 CVEs total

CVE-2024-50019kthread: unpark only parked kthread
CVE-2024-50030drm/xe/ct: prevent UAF in send_recv()
CVE-2024-50028thermal: core: Reference count the zone in thermal_zone_get_by_id()
CVE-2024-50029Bluetooth: hci_conn: Fix UAF in hci_enhanced_setup_sync
CVE-2024-50027thermal: core: Free tzp copy along with the thermal zone
CVE-2024-50025scsi: fnic: Move flush_work initialization out of if block
CVE-2024-50026scsi: wd33c93: Don't use stale scsi_pointer value
CVE-2024-50023net: phy: Remove LED entry from LEDs list on unregister
CVE-2024-50024net: Fix an unsafe loop on the list
CVE-2024-50022device-dax: correct pgoff align in dax_set_mapping()
CVE-2024-50021ice: Fix improper handling of refcount in ice_dpll_init_rclk_pins()
CVE-2024-50020ice: Fix improper handling of refcount in ice_sriov_set_msix_vec_count()
CVE-2024-50011ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi-intel-rpl-match: add missing empty item
CVE-2024-50006ext4: fix i_data_sem unlock order in ext4_ind_migrate()
CVE-2024-50007ALSA: asihpi: Fix potential OOB array access
CVE-2024-50008wifi: mwifiex: Fix memcpy() field-spanning write warning in mwifiex_cmd_802_11_scan_ext()
CVE-2024-50009cpufreq: amd-pstate: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return value
CVE-2024-50010exec: don't WARN for racy path_noexec check
CVE-2024-50014ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path
CVE-2024-50017x86/mm/ident_map: Use gbpages only where full GB page should be mapped.

Showing top 20 of 372 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2024-49998

No comments yet


Leave a comment