CVE-2024-3596— RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2024-3596
Vulnerability Information
Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗ Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
Vulnerability Title
RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865是RFC开源的一个网络协议。 RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在安全漏洞。攻击者利用该漏洞导致系统拒绝服务。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
II. Public POCs for CVE-2024-3596
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | None | https://github.com/alperenugurlu/CVE-2024-3596-Detector | POC Details |
AI-Generated POCPremium
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POCIII. Intelligence Information for CVE-2024-3596
请登录查看更多情报信息。
- SSA-794185vendor-advisory
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3596
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2024-3596
No comments yet