Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CVE-2022-50335— 9p: set req refcount to zero to avoid uninitialized usage

AI Predicted 5.5 Difficulty: Moderate EPSS 0.02% · P5

Affected Version Matrix 12

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
LinuxLinux728356dedeff8ef999cb436c71333ef4ac51a81c< 1cabce56626a61f4f02452cba61ad4332a4b73f8affected
728356dedeff8ef999cb436c71333ef4ac51a81c< 73c47b3123b351de2d3714a72a336c0f72f203afaffected
728356dedeff8ef999cb436c71333ef4ac51a81c< 967fc34f297e40fd2e068cf6b0c3eb4916228539affected
728356dedeff8ef999cb436c71333ef4ac51a81c< 26273ade77f54716e30dfd40ac6e85ceb54ac0f9affected
3665a4d9dca1bd06bc34afb72e637fe01b2776eeaffected
4.19.57< 4.20affected
4.20affected
< 4.20unaffected
… +4 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2022-50335

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
9p: set req refcount to zero to avoid uninitialized usage
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p: set req refcount to zero to avoid uninitialized usage When a new request is allocated, the refcount will be zero if it is reused, but if the request is newly allocated from slab, it is not fully initialized before being added to idr. If the p9_read_work got a response before the refcount initiated. It will use a uninitialized req, which will result in a bad request data struct. Here is the logs from syzbot. Corrupted memory at 0xffff88807eade00b [ 0xff 0x07 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 . . . . . . . . ] (in kfence-#110): p9_fcall_fini net/9p/client.c:248 [inline] p9_req_put net/9p/client.c:396 [inline] p9_req_put+0x208/0x250 net/9p/client.c:390 p9_client_walk+0x247/0x540 net/9p/client.c:1165 clone_fid fs/9p/fid.h:21 [inline] v9fs_fid_xattr_set+0xe4/0x2b0 fs/9p/xattr.c:118 v9fs_xattr_set fs/9p/xattr.c:100 [inline] v9fs_xattr_handler_set+0x6f/0x120 fs/9p/xattr.c:159 __vfs_setxattr+0x119/0x180 fs/xattr.c:182 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:216 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:277 vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:309 setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:617 path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:636 __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:652 [inline] __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:648 [inline] __ia32_sys_setxattr+0xc0/0x160 fs/xattr.c:648 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 Below is a similar scenario, the scenario in the syzbot log looks more complicated than this one, but this patch can fix it. T21124 p9_read_work ======================== second trans ================================= p9_client_walk p9_client_rpc p9_client_prepare_req p9_tag_alloc req = kmem_cache_alloc(p9_req_cache, GFP_NOFS); tag = idr_alloc << preempted >> req->tc.tag = tag; /* req->[refcount/tag] == uninitialized */ m->rreq = p9_tag_lookup(m->client, m->rc.tag); /* increments uninitalized refcount */ refcount_set(&req->refcount, 2); /* cb drops one ref */ p9_client_cb(req) /* reader thread drops its ref: request is incorrectly freed */ p9_req_put(req) /* use after free and ref underflow */ p9_req_put(req) To fix it, we can initialize the refcount to zero before add to idr.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于未初始化请求引用计数,可能导致使用未初始化的请求数据结构。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux 728356dedeff8ef999cb436c71333ef4ac51a81c ~ 1cabce56626a61f4f02452cba61ad4332a4b73f8 -
LinuxLinux 4.20 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2022-50335

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2022-50335

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2025-09-15 · 210 CVEs total

CVE-2022-50292drm/msm/dp: fix bridge lifetime
CVE-2023-53231erofs: Fix detection of atomic context
CVE-2023-53232mt76: mt7921: fix kernel panic by accessing unallocated eeprom.data
CVE-2023-53233net/smc: fix deadlock triggered by cancel_delayed_work_syn()
CVE-2023-53234watchdog: Fix kmemleak in watchdog_cdev_register
CVE-2023-53235drm/tests: helpers: Avoid a driver uaf
CVE-2023-53236iommufd: Do not corrupt the pfn list when doing batch carry
CVE-2023-53237drm/amdgpu: fix amdgpu_irq_put call trace in gmc_v11_0_hw_fini
CVE-2023-53238phy: hisilicon: Fix an out of bounds check in hisi_inno_phy_probe()
CVE-2023-53239drm/msm/mdp5: Add check for kzalloc
CVE-2023-53240xsk: check IFF_UP earlier in Tx path
CVE-2023-53241nfsd: call op_release, even when op_func returns an error
CVE-2023-53242thermal/drivers/hisi: Drop second sensor hi3660
CVE-2022-50291kcm: annotate data-races around kcm->rx_psock
CVE-2022-50302lockd: set other missing fields when unlocking files
CVE-2022-50299md: Replace snprintf with scnprintf
CVE-2022-50300btrfs: fix extent map use-after-free when handling missing device in read_one_chunk
CVE-2022-50301iommu/omap: Fix buffer overflow in debugfs
CVE-2022-50298slimbus: qcom-ngd: cleanup in probe error path
CVE-2022-50303drm/amdkfd: Fix double release compute pasid

Showing top 20 of 210 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2022-50335

No comments yet


Leave a comment