Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2022-49985— bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors

EPSS 0.07% · P21
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2022-49985

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which is based on a customized syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489 CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197 ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640 ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0 bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220 ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120 ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180 __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070 ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? fput+0x30/0x1a0 ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in 00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the upper index check.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于数组范围检查使用tnum_range,可能导致越界读取。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux d2e4c1e6c2947269346054ac8937ccfe9e0bcc6b ~ e8979807178434db8ceaa84dfcd44363e71e50bb -
LinuxLinux 5.5 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2022-49985

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2022-49985

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2025-06-18 · 362 CVEs total

CVE-2022-50104powerpc/xive: Fix refcount leak in xive_get_max_prio
CVE-2022-50116tty: n_gsm: fix deadlock and link starvation in outgoing data path
CVE-2022-50114net: 9p: fix refcount leak in p9_read_work() error handling
CVE-2022-50113ASoc: audio-graph-card2: Fix refcount leak bug in __graph_get_type()
CVE-2022-50112rpmsg: qcom_smd: Fix refcount leak in qcom_smd_parse_edge
CVE-2022-50111ASoC: mt6359: Fix refcount leak bug
CVE-2022-50110watchdog: sp5100_tco: Fix a memory leak of EFCH MMIO resource
CVE-2022-50109video: fbdev: amba-clcd: Fix refcount leak bugs
CVE-2022-50108mfd: max77620: Fix refcount leak in max77620_initialise_fps
CVE-2022-50106powerpc/cell/axon_msi: Fix refcount leak in setup_msi_msg_address
CVE-2022-50107cifs: Fix memory leak when using fscache
CVE-2022-50105powerpc/spufs: Fix refcount leak in spufs_init_isolated_loader
CVE-2022-50099video: fbdev: arkfb: Check the size of screen before memset_io()
CVE-2022-50095posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup CPU timers before freeing them during exec
CVE-2022-50094spmi: trace: fix stack-out-of-bound access in SPMI tracing functions
CVE-2022-50096x86/kprobes: Update kcb status flag after singlestepping
CVE-2022-50097video: fbdev: s3fb: Check the size of screen before memset_io()
CVE-2022-50098scsi: qla2xxx: Fix crash due to stale SRB access around I/O timeouts
CVE-2022-50101video: fbdev: vt8623fb: Check the size of screen before memset_io()
CVE-2022-50103sched, cpuset: Fix dl_cpu_busy() panic due to empty cs->cpus_allowed

Showing top 20 of 362 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2022-49985

No comments yet


Leave a comment