Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CVE-2022-48980— net: dsa: sja1105: avoid out of bounds access in sja1105_init_l2_policing()

EPSS 0.02% · P4
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2022-48980

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
net: dsa: sja1105: avoid out of bounds access in sja1105_init_l2_policing()
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: sja1105: avoid out of bounds access in sja1105_init_l2_policing() The SJA1105 family has 45 L2 policing table entries (SJA1105_MAX_L2_POLICING_COUNT) and SJA1110 has 110 (SJA1110_MAX_L2_POLICING_COUNT). Keeping the table structure but accounting for the difference in port count (5 in SJA1105 vs 10 in SJA1110) does not fully explain the difference. Rather, the SJA1110 also has L2 ingress policers for multicast traffic. If a packet is classified as multicast, it will be processed by the policer index 99 + SRCPORT. The sja1105_init_l2_policing() function initializes all L2 policers such that they don't interfere with normal packet reception by default. To have a common code between SJA1105 and SJA1110, the index of the multicast policer for the port is calculated because it's an index that is out of bounds for SJA1105 but in bounds for SJA1110, and a bounds check is performed. The code fails to do the proper thing when determining what to do with the multicast policer of port 0 on SJA1105 (ds->num_ports = 5). The "mcast" index will be equal to 45, which is also equal to table->ops->max_entry_count (SJA1105_MAX_L2_POLICING_COUNT). So it passes through the check. But at the same time, SJA1105 doesn't have multicast policers. So the code programs the SHARINDX field of an out-of-bounds element in the L2 Policing table of the static config. The comparison between index 45 and 45 entries should have determined the code to not access this policer index on SJA1105, since its memory wasn't even allocated. With enough bad luck, the out-of-bounds write could even overwrite other valid kernel data, but in this case, the issue was detected using KASAN. Kernel log: sja1105 spi5.0: Probed switch chip: SJA1105Q ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sja1105_setup+0x1cbc/0x2340 Write of size 8 at addr ffffff880bd57708 by task kworker/u8:0/8 ... Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: ... sja1105_setup+0x1cbc/0x2340 dsa_register_switch+0x1284/0x18d0 sja1105_probe+0x748/0x840 ... Allocated by task 8: ... sja1105_setup+0x1bcc/0x2340 dsa_register_switch+0x1284/0x18d0 sja1105_probe+0x748/0x840 ...
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于net:dsa:sja1105子系统中sja1105_init_l2_policing函数中的越界访问问题。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux 38fbe91f2287c696f290d9115901aa435f7166a8 ~ 5e88c6f4aaa70c542e59e5a9d2244bcc99cd245d -
LinuxLinux 5.14 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2022-48980

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2022-48980

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2024-10-21 · 372 CVEs total

CVE-2024-50017x86/mm/ident_map: Use gbpages only where full GB page should be mapped.
CVE-2024-50028thermal: core: Reference count the zone in thermal_zone_get_by_id()
CVE-2024-50029Bluetooth: hci_conn: Fix UAF in hci_enhanced_setup_sync
CVE-2024-50027thermal: core: Free tzp copy along with the thermal zone
CVE-2024-50025scsi: fnic: Move flush_work initialization out of if block
CVE-2024-50026scsi: wd33c93: Don't use stale scsi_pointer value
CVE-2024-50023net: phy: Remove LED entry from LEDs list on unregister
CVE-2024-50024net: Fix an unsafe loop on the list
CVE-2024-50022device-dax: correct pgoff align in dax_set_mapping()
CVE-2024-50021ice: Fix improper handling of refcount in ice_dpll_init_rclk_pins()
CVE-2024-50020ice: Fix improper handling of refcount in ice_sriov_set_msix_vec_count()
CVE-2024-50019kthread: unpark only parked kthread
CVE-2024-50010exec: don't WARN for racy path_noexec check
CVE-2024-50005mac802154: Fix potential RCU dereference issue in mac802154_scan_worker
CVE-2024-50006ext4: fix i_data_sem unlock order in ext4_ind_migrate()
CVE-2024-50007ALSA: asihpi: Fix potential OOB array access
CVE-2024-50008wifi: mwifiex: Fix memcpy() field-spanning write warning in mwifiex_cmd_802_11_scan_ext()
CVE-2024-50009cpufreq: amd-pstate: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return value
CVE-2024-50013exfat: fix memory leak in exfat_load_bitmap()
CVE-2024-50015ext4: dax: fix overflowing extents beyond inode size when partially writing

Showing top 20 of 372 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2022-48980

No comments yet


Leave a comment