CVE-2019-6465— Zone transfer controls for writable DLZ zones were not effective
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2019-6465
Vulnerability Information
Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗ Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
Vulnerability Title
Zone transfer controls for writable DLZ zones were not effective
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Controls for zone transfers may not be properly applied to Dynamically Loadable Zones (DLZs) if the zones are writable Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.5-P2, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.3-P2, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition. Versions 9.13.0 -> 9.13.6 of the 9.13 development branch are also affected. Versions prior to BIND 9.9.0 have not been evaluated for vulnerability to CVE-2019-6465.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
ISC BIND 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
ISC BIND是美国ISC公司的一套实现了DNS协议的开源软件。 ISC BIND中存在安全漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞请求并接受区域传输。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISC | BIND 9 | BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.5-P2, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.3-P2, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition. Versions 9.13.0 -> 9.13.6 of the 9.13 development branch are also affected. Versions prior to BIND 9.9.0 have not be | - |
II. Public POCs for CVE-2019-6465
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
AI-Generated POCPremium
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POCIII. Intelligence Information for CVE-2019-6465
请登录查看更多情报信息。
- https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2019-6465x_refsource_CONFIRM
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-6465
Same Patch Batch · ISC · 2019-10-09 · 9 CVEs total
| CVE-2018-5732 | A specially constructed response from a malicious server can cause a buffer overflow in dh | |
| CVE-2018-5743 | Limiting simultaneous TCP clients was ineffective | |
| CVE-2018-5744 | A specially crafted packet can cause named to leak memory | |
| CVE-2018-5745 | An assertion failure can occur if a trust anchor rolls over to an unsupported key algorith | |
| CVE-2019-6467 | An error in the nxdomain redirect feature can cause BIND to exit with an INSIST assertion | |
| CVE-2019-6468 | BIND Supported Preview Edition can exit with an assertion failure if nxdomain-redirect is | |
| CVE-2019-6469 | BIND Supported Preview Edition can exit with an assertion failure if ECS is in use | |
| CVE-2019-6471 | A race condition when discarding malformed packets can cause BIND to exit with an assertio |
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
Same product: BIND 9
- CVE-2026-3591
A stack use-after-return flaw in SIG(0) handling code may en - CVE-2026-3119
Authenticated query containing a TKEY record may cause named - CVE-2026-3104
Memory leak in code preparing DNSSEC proofs of non-existence - CVE-2026-1519
Excessive NSEC3 iterations cause high CPU load during insecu - CVE-2025-13878
Malformed BRID/HHIT records can cause named to terminate une
Same vendor: ISC
- CVE-2026-3591
A stack use-after-return flaw in SIG(0) handling code may en - CVE-2026-3119
Authenticated query containing a TKEY record may cause named - CVE-2026-3104
Memory leak in code preparing DNSSEC proofs of non-existence - CVE-2026-1519
Excessive NSEC3 iterations cause high CPU load during insecu - CVE-2026-3608
Stack overflow in Kea daemons
V. Comments for CVE-2019-6465
No comments yet