CVE-2016-1587
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2016-1587
Vulnerability Information
Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗ Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
The Snapweb interface before version 0.21.2 was exposing controls to install or remove snap packages without controlling the identity of the user, nor the origin of the connection. An attacker could have used the controls to remotely add a valid, but malicious, snap package, from the Store, potentially using system resources without permission from the legitimate administrator of the system.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Snapweb interface 访问控制错误漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Snapweb interface是一款用于快照管理的用户界面。 Snapweb interface 0.21.2之前版本中存在访问控制错误漏洞。该漏洞源于网络系统或产品未正确限制来自未授权角色的资源访问。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
II. Public POCs for CVE-2016-1587
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
AI-Generated POCPremium
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POCIII. Intelligence Information for CVE-2016-1587
Please Login to view more intelligence information
Same Patch Batch · Ubuntu · 2019-04-22 · 15 CVEs total
| CVE-2014-1426 | get_file_by_name does not check owner | |
| CVE-2014-1427 | MAAS API vulnerable to CSRF attack | |
| CVE-2014-1428 | uuid.uuid1() is not suitable as an unguessable identifier/token | |
| CVE-2015-1316 | Juju Joyent provider uploads user's private ssh key by default | |
| CVE-2015-1320 | Probe-and-enlist for SeaMicro chassis writes password to the log | |
| CVE-2015-1326 | python-dbusmock arbitrary code execution or file overwrite when templates are loaded from | |
| CVE-2015-1327 | Content-hub DBUS API doesn't prevent confined apps from passing paths to files without acc | |
| CVE-2015-1340 | chmod race in doUidshiftIntoContainer | |
| CVE-2015-1341 | Apport privilege escalation through Python module imports | |
| CVE-2015-1343 | unity-scope-gdrive search feature logs search terms to syslog | |
| CVE-2016-1573 | Using a specially crafted fallback art property, scopes can execute arbitrary QML code in | |
| CVE-2016-1579 | UDM doesn't check for confinement before running post-processing commands | |
| CVE-2016-1584 | Unity8 converged application lifecycle allows background applications to use on-screen key | |
| CVE-2016-1586 | Oxide 输入验证错误漏洞 |
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2016-1587
No comments yet