Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-863 (授权机制不正确) — Vulnerability Class 1278

1278 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-863 (授权机制不正确). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-863, Incorrect Authorization, represents a critical logic flaw where software fails to properly verify an actor’s permissions before granting access to resources or executing actions. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating input parameters, such as altering user IDs or session tokens, to bypass intended access controls and interact with data or functions reserved for privileged users. This often leads to unauthorized data disclosure, modification, or complete system compromise. To prevent such breaches, developers must implement robust, centralized authorization checks that are consistently applied across all application layers. Relying solely on client-side restrictions is insufficient; instead, server-side validation should enforce strict role-based or attribute-based access controls for every request, ensuring that permission verification occurs reliably before any sensitive operation is permitted.

MITRE CWE Description
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Common Consequences (5)
ConfidentialityRead Application Data, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could bypass intended access restrictions to read sensitive data, either by reading the data directly from a data store that is not correctly restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to read the data.
IntegrityModify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories
An attacker could bypass intended access restrictions to modify sensitive data, either by writing the data directly to a data store that is not correctly restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to write the data.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
An attacker could bypass intended access restrictions to gain privileges by modifying or reading critical data directly, or by accessing privileged functionality.
Confidentiality, Integrity, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use elevated privileges to execute unauthorized commands or code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)
An attacker could gain unauthorized access to resources on the system and excessively consume those resources, leading to a denial of service.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignDivide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the …
Architecture and DesignEnsure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Architecture and DesignFor web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests …
System Configuration, InstallationUse the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
Examples (1)
The following code could be for a medical records application. It displays a record to already authenticated users, confirming the user's authorization using a value stored in a cookie.
$role = $_COOKIES['role']; if (!$role) { $role = getRole('user'); if ($role) { // save the cookie to send out in future responses setcookie("role", $role, time()+60*60*2); } else{ ShowLoginScreen(); die("\n"); } } if ($role == 'Reader') { DisplayMedicalHistory($_POST['patient_ID']); } else{ die("You are not Authorized to view this record\n"); }
Bad · PHP
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-66423 Tryton trytond 安全漏洞 — trytond 7.1 High2025-11-30
CVE-2025-12971 Folders <= 3.1.5 - Incorrect Authorization to Authenticated (Contributor+) Folder Content Manipulation — Folders – Unlimited Folders to Organize Media Library Folder, Pages, Posts, File Manager 4.3 Medium2025-11-27
CVE-2024-5539 ALC WebCTRL Carrier i-Vu Access Control Bypass — WebCTRL 7.5 -2025-11-27
CVE-2025-66360 Logpoint SIEM 安全漏洞 — SIEM 7.2 -2025-11-27
CVE-2025-13432 Terraform Enterprise state versions can be created by users with specific permissions without sufficient write access — Terraform Enterprise 4.3 Medium2025-11-21
CVE-2025-62189 LogStare Collector 安全漏洞 — LogStare Collector (for Windows) 6.5 -2025-11-21
CVE-2025-62730 Privilege Escalation via Incorrect Authorization in SOPlanning — SOPlanning 8.8 -2025-11-20
CVE-2025-59111 Broken Access Control in Windu CMS — Windu CMS 6.5AIMediumAI2025-11-18
CVE-2025-41346 Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in WinPlus by Informática del Este — WinPlus 8.1AIHighAI2025-11-18
CVE-2025-65073 Keystone 安全漏洞 — Keystone 7.5 High2025-11-17
CVE-2025-7736 Incorrect Authorization in GitLab — GitLab 3.1 Low2025-11-15
CVE-2025-11865 Incorrect Authorization in GitLab — GitLab 4.3 Medium2025-11-15
CVE-2025-41436 Unauthorized access to archived channel content via threads interface — Mattermost 3.1 Low2025-11-14
CVE-2025-11776 Guest user can discover archived public channels — Mattermost 4.3 Medium2025-11-14
CVE-2025-64753 grist-core has insufficient access control in endpoints for comparisons between documents and versions — grist-core 5.3 Medium2025-11-13
CVE-2025-11777 Cross-team channel membership access — Mattermost 3.1 Low2025-11-13
CVE-2025-64707 Frappe LMS revoking access did not show immediate effect as roles were cached — lms 6.3 -2025-11-12
CVE-2025-65002 Fujitsu iRMC 安全漏洞 — iRMC 7.5 High2025-11-12
CVE-2025-61830 Adobe Pass | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) — Adobe Pass 7.1 High2025-11-11
CVE-2025-11862 Verve Asset Manager Access Control Vulnerability — Verve Asset Manager 8.8 -2025-11-11
CVE-2025-49145 iTop admin can drop iTop database using webhooks — iTop 8.7 High2025-11-10
CVE-2025-12621 Flexible Refund and Return Order for WooCommerce <= 1.0.42 - Incorrect Authorization to Authenticated (Contributor+) Refund Status Update — Flexible Refund and Return Order for WooCommerce 5.3 Medium2025-11-08
CVE-2025-64490 SuiteCRM's Inconsistent RBAC Enforcement Enables Access Control Bypass — SuiteCRM 8.3 High2025-11-08
CVE-2025-37736 Elastic Cloud Enterprise Improper Authorization — Elastic Cloud Enterprise (ECE) 8.8 High2025-11-07
CVE-2025-12038 Folderly <= 0.3 - Incorrect Authorization to Authenticated (Author+) Term Deletion — Folderly 4.3 Medium2025-11-01
CVE-2025-62275 Liferay Portal和Liferay DXP 安全漏洞 — Portal 4.3 -2025-11-01
CVE-2025-34273 Nagios Log Server < 2024R2.0.3 Non-Admin Dashboard Deletion — Log Server 4.3AIMediumAI2025-10-30
CVE-2023-7322 Nagios Log Server < 2024R1 Incorrect Authorization Granting Full API Access — Log Server 8.1AIHighAI2025-10-30
CVE-2025-62795 JumpServer Unauthorized LDAP Configuration Access via WebSocket — jumpserver 7.1 High2025-10-30
CVE-2025-12082 CivicTheme Design System - Moderately critical - Information disclosure - SA-CONTRIB-2025-112 — CivicTheme Design System 7.5AIHighAI2025-10-29

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-863 (授权机制不正确) represent 1278 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.