目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1000

100.0%

CWE-863 授权机制不正确 类漏洞列表 1275

CWE-863 授权机制不正确 类弱点 1275 条 CVE 漏洞汇总,含 AI 中文分析。

CWE-863属于授权检查缺陷,指系统在验证用户访问权限时未能正确执行检查逻辑。攻击者通常利用此漏洞,通过构造恶意请求或篡改参数,绕过权限控制以访问未授权资源或执行敏感操作。开发者应避免此问题,需确保在关键操作前严格验证用户身份与权限,采用最小权限原则,并实施集中式的授权管理,防止逻辑绕过或硬编码错误。

MITRE CWE 官方描述
CWE:CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization(不正确的授权) 英文:当主体(actor)尝试访问资源或执行操作时,产品会执行授权检查,但未能正确执行该检查。
常见影响 (5)
ConfidentialityRead Application Data, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could bypass intended access restrictions to read sensitive data, either by reading the data directly from a data store that is not correctly restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to read the data.
IntegrityModify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories
An attacker could bypass intended access restrictions to modify sensitive data, either by writing the data directly to a data store that is not correctly restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to write the data.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
An attacker could bypass intended access restrictions to gain privileges by modifying or reading critical data directly, or by accessing privileged functionality.
Confidentiality, Integrity, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use elevated privileges to execute unauthorized commands or code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)
An attacker could gain unauthorized access to resources on the system and excessively consume those resources, leading to a denial of service.
缓解措施 (5)
Architecture and DesignDivide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the …
Architecture and DesignEnsure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Architecture and DesignFor web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests …
System Configuration, InstallationUse the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
代码示例 (1)
The following code could be for a medical records application. It displays a record to already authenticated users, confirming the user's authorization using a value stored in a cookie.
$role = $_COOKIES['role']; if (!$role) { $role = getRole('user'); if ($role) { // save the cookie to send out in future responses setcookie("role", $role, time()+60*60*2); } else{ ShowLoginScreen(); die("\n"); } } if ($role == 'Reader') { DisplayMedicalHistory($_POST['patient_ID']); } else{ die("You are not Authorized to view this record\n"); }
Bad · PHP
CVE ID标题CVSS风险等级Published
CVE-2025-66170 Apache CloudStack 备份列表越权访问漏洞 — Apache CloudStack--2026-05-08
CVE-2026-41903 FreeScout IDOR漏洞:PERM_EDIT_USERS可修改任意用户通知订阅 — freescout 5.4 Medium2026-05-07
CVE-2026-41689 Wallos 共享本地 webhook 允许列表漏洞 — Wallos 6.0 Medium2026-05-07
CVE-2026-41660 Admidio 2FA重置授权检查漏洞导致管理员TOTP被移除 — admidio 7.1 High2026-05-07
CVE-2026-41657 Admidio contacts_data.php 越权致成员数据泄露 — admidio 4.9 Medium2026-05-07
CVE-2026-40213 OpenStack Cyborg越权漏洞 — Cyborg 7.4 High2026-05-07
CVE-2026-44110 OpenClaw <2026.4.15 矩阵房间授权绕过漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-05-06
CVE-2026-6863 HTTP文件存储端点跨组织错误应用权限漏洞 — Velociraptor 6.8 Medium2026-05-06
CVE-2026-39852 Quarkus 授权绕过漏洞 — quarkus--2026-05-05
CVE-2026-39402 lxc lxc-user-nic 权限验证不足致 OVS 端口删除漏洞 — lxc--2026-05-05
CVE-2026-33489 CoreDNS transfer 插件子区域ACL绕过漏洞 — coredns--2026-05-05
CVE-2026-43530 OpenClaw <2026.4.12 busybox/toybox执行批准绑定减弱漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-05-05
CVE-2026-42438 OpenClaw 2026.4.9 主机媒体附件读取发送者策略绕过漏洞 — OpenClaw 7.7 High2026-05-05
CVE-2026-42434 OpenClaw 2026.4.10以下沙箱逃逸漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-05-05
CVE-2026-25293 PLC 固件错误授权漏洞 — Snapdragon 9.6 Critical2026-05-04
CVE-2026-42812 Apache Polaris write.metadata.path 无保护漏洞 — Apache Polaris 9.9 Critical2026-05-04
CVE-2026-43504 Prosody mod_proxy65访问控制漏洞 — Prosody 6.5 Medium2026-05-01
CVE-2026-43001 OpenStack Keystone跨项目权限绕过漏洞 — Keystone 7.9 High2026-05-01
CVE-2026-41174 Traefik Kubernetes CRD 未授权跨命名空间中间件绑定漏洞 — traefik 9.3AICriticalAI2026-04-30
CVE-2026-5712 SailPoint IdentityIQ 安全漏洞 — IdentityIQ 8.0 High2026-04-29
CVE-2026-42432 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 7.8 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-42431 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.1 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-42429 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 7.1 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-42426 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-42422 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41910 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 4.3 Medium2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41404 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41381 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 5.4 Medium2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41379 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 7.1 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41375 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 6.5 Medium2026-04-28

CWE-863(授权机制不正确) 是常见的弱点类别,本平台收录该类弱点关联的 1275 条 CVE 漏洞。