Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)) — Vulnerability Class 348

348 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-843, Type Confusion, is a critical memory safety weakness where a resource is initialized with one data type but subsequently accessed using an incompatible type. This discrepancy often triggers logical errors or undefined behavior, particularly in memory-unsafe languages like C and C++, where the program misinterprets the underlying bit patterns. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious inputs that force the application to treat a pointer or object as a different type, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution, data corruption, or denial of service. To mitigate this risk, developers must enforce strict type checking and validation at runtime. Utilizing memory-safe programming languages, implementing comprehensive unit tests for type assertions, and employing static analysis tools can effectively detect these mismatches before deployment, ensuring that resources are always accessed according to their intended definitions.

MITRE CWE Description
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type. When the product accesses the resource using an incompatible type, this could trigger logical errors because the resource does not have expected properties. In languages without memory safety, such as C and C++, type confusion can lead to out-of-bounds memory access. While this weakness is frequently associated with unions when parsing data with many different embedded object types in C, it can be present in any application that can interpret the same variable or memory location in multiple ways. This weakness is not unique to C and C++. For example, errors in PHP applications can be triggered by providing array parameters when scalars are expected, or vice versa. Languages such as Perl, which perform automatic conversion of a variable of one type when it is accessed as if it were another type, can also contain these issues.
Common Consequences (1)
Availability, Integrity, ConfidentialityRead Memory, Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
When a memory buffer is accessed using the wrong type, it could read or write memory out of the bounds of the buffer, if the allocated buffer is smaller than the type that the code is attempting to access, leading to a crash and possibly code execution.
Examples (2)
The following code uses a union to support the representation of different types of messages. It formats messages differently, depending on their type.
#define NAME_TYPE 1 #define ID_TYPE 2 struct MessageBuffer { int msgType; union { char *name; int nameID; }; }; int main (int argc, char **argv) { struct MessageBuffer buf; char *defaultMessage = "Hello World"; buf.msgType = NAME_TYPE; buf.name = defaultMessage; printf("Pointer of buf.name is %p\n", buf.name); /* This particular value for nameID is used to make the code architecture-independent. If coming from untrusted input, it could be any value. */ buf.nameID = (int)(defaultMessage + 1); printf("Pointer of buf.name is now %p\n", buf.name); if (buf.msgType == NAME_TYPE) { printf("Message: %
Bad · C
The following PHP code accepts a value, adds 5, and prints the sum.
$value = $_GET['value']; $sum = $value + 5; echo "value parameter is '$value'<p>"; echo "SUM is $sum";
Bad · PHP
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-7988 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7927 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7914 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 9.6AICriticalAI2026-05-06
CVE-2026-6210 Type confusion and heap-buffer-overflow in Qt SVG marker handling causing application crash — Qt 6.5AIMediumAI2026-05-06
CVE-2026-43862 mutt 安全漏洞 — mutt 3.7 Low2026-05-04
CVE-2026-20451 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MediaTek chipset 6.7 -2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7337 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-28
CVE-2026-6732 Libxml2: libxml2: denial of service via crafted xsd-validated document — Red Hat Hardened Images 6.5 Medium2026-04-23
CVE-2026-6363 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2026-04-15
CVE-2026-6307 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2026-04-15
CVE-2026-6301 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2026-04-15
CVE-2026-27298 Adobe Framemaker | Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') (CWE-843) — Adobe Framemaker 7.8 High2026-04-14
CVE-2026-40683 OpenStack Keystone 安全漏洞 — Keystone 7.7 High2026-04-14
CVE-2026-20806 Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 5.5 Medium2026-04-14
CVE-2026-26162 Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High2026-04-14
CVE-2026-40446 SAMSUNG Escargot 安全漏洞 — Escargot 6.9 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-5496 Labcenter Electronics Proteus PDSPRJ File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Proteus 7.8AIHighAI2026-04-11
CVE-2026-5914 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5871 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-5865 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-08
CVE-2026-35541 Roundcube Webmail 安全漏洞 — Webmail 4.2 Medium2026-04-03
CVE-2026-5360 Free5GC aper type confusion — Free5GC 3.7 Low2026-04-02
CVE-2026-34595 Parse Server: LiveQuery protected-field guard bypass via array-like logical operator value — parse-server 8.8AIHighAI2026-03-31
CVE-2026-33937 Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion — handlebars.js 9.8 Critical2026-03-27
CVE-2026-32701 Qwik has array method pollution in FormData processing, allowing type confusion and DoS — qwik 7.5 High2026-03-20
CVE-2026-33055 tar-rs incorrectly ignores PAX size headers if header size is nonzero — tar-rs 6.5 -2026-03-20
CVE-2026-4457 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2026-03-20
CVE-2025-66342 Canva Affinity 安全漏洞 — Affinity 7.8 High2026-03-17
CVE-2025-25277 arkcompiler_ets_runtime has a type confusion vulnerability — OpenHarmony 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-29079 Type Confusion in Lexbor Fragment Parser — lexbor 8.3 -2026-03-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)) represent 348 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.