Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 3330

3330 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-78 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs operating system commands using untrusted external data without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious shell metacharacters, such as semicolons or pipes, into user-supplied fields like form inputs or URL parameters. This manipulation allows the attacker to alter the intended command structure, enabling arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise. To mitigate this risk, developers must strictly avoid passing user input directly to OS command interpreters. Instead, they should utilize safe, language-specific APIs that do not invoke the shell, or implement rigorous input validation and parameterization techniques. By treating all external data as inherently untrusted and applying strict allow-list filtering, organizations can effectively neutralize special elements and prevent command injection vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage. There are at least two subtypes of OS command injection: The application intends to execute a single, fixed program that is under its own control. It intends to use externally-supplied inputs as arguments to that program. For example, the program might use system("nslookup [HOSTNAME]") to run nslookup and allow the user to supply a HOSTNAME, which is used as an argument. Attackers cannot prevent nslookup from executing. However, if the program does not remove command separators from the HOSTNAME argument, attackers could place the separators into the arguments, which allows them to execute their own program afte…
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-RepudiationExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Hide Activities
Attackers could execute unauthorized operating system commands, which could then be used to disable the product, or read and modify data for which the attacker does not have permissions to access directly. Since the targeted application is directly executing the commands instead of the attacker, any…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Architecture and Design, OperationRun the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For ex…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and DesignFor any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Examples (2)
This example code intends to take the name of a user and list the contents of that user's home directory. It is subject to the first variant of OS command injection.
$userName = $_POST["user"]; $command = 'ls -l /home/' . $userName; system($command);
Bad · PHP
;rm -rf /
Attack
The following simple program accepts a filename as a command line argument and displays the contents of the file back to the user. The program is installed setuid root because it is intended for use as a learning tool to allow system administrators in-training to inspect privileged system files without giving them the ability to modify them or damage the system.
int main(int argc, char** argv) { char cmd[CMD_MAX] = "/usr/bin/cat "; strcat(cmd, argv[1]); system(cmd); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-15669 louisho5 picobot exec Tool exec.go ExecTool.Execute os command injection — picobot 5.3 Medium2026-07-14
CVE-2026-61498 Vitec Flamingo 4.12.2 Unauthenticated OS Command Injection via gen_graphs.php — Flamingo 9.8 Critical2026-07-13
CVE-2026-60121 Vitec Flamingo 4.12.2 Unauthenticated OS Command Injection via ping.php — Flamingo 9.8 Critical2026-07-13
CVE-2026-22100 Comnand injection in OCPP ReserveLogin message — DC-80--2026-07-13
CVE-2026-15547 Shibby Tomato CIFS Mount sub_2D048 os command injection — Tomato 6.3 Medium2026-07-13
CVE-2026-15546 Shibby Tomato start_jffs2 sub_2D568 os command injection — Tomato 6.3 Medium2026-07-13
CVE-2026-15513 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 adm.cgi wlink_uci_set_value os command injection — WL-NU516U1 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15511 Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 FastCGI Backend webmgnt system_wl_upload_pic_file os command injection — CF-WR631AX V3 9.8 Critical2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15496 SonicCloudOrg sonic-agent Groovy Script GroovyScriptImpl.java evalIsFailed os command injection — sonic-agent 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15495 SonicCloudOrg sonic-agent Android WebSocket Server AndroidWSServer.java os command injection — sonic-agent 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15487 TRENDnet TEW-821DAP Firmware Update system_ntp sub_41FBD0 os command injection — TEW-821DAP 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15486 TRENDnet TEW-821DAP Firmware Update tools_ddns sub_42026C os command injection — TEW-821DAP 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15485 TRENDnet TEW-821DAP DNS Lookup tools_nslookup sub_43F2C4 os command injection — TEW-821DAP 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2025-30007 HestiaCP < 1.9.5 Authenticated OS Command Injection via DNS Record Management — hestiacp 8.8 High2026-07-10
CVE-2026-54149 MaxKB MCP tool import validation bypass allows post-authentication remote code execution — MaxKB 8.8 High2026-07-10
CVE-2026-61434 PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Allowlist Bypass via find -exec — PraisonAI 8.8 High2026-07-10
CVE-2026-56688 Dell powerflex manager 命令注入漏洞 — PowerFlex Manager 9.1 Critical2026-07-10
CVE-2026-41880 OS Command Injection in R-SOFT DMS — DMS--2026-07-10
CVE-2026-41876 OS Command Injection in R-SOFT DMS — DMS--2026-07-10
CVE-2026-0286 PAN-OS: Authenticated Command Injection in CLI — Cloud NGFW 6.0 Medium2026-07-09
CVE-2026-55420 Discourse: Remote code execution via pdf uploads — discourse 7.5 High2026-07-09
CVE-2026-59734 Coolify: OS Command Injection in Health Check Configuration Allows Remote Code Execution — coolify 8.8 High2026-07-09
CVE-2026-59726 Ruflo: Unauthenticated RCE in MCP bridge default docker-compose deployment — ruflo 10.0 Critical2026-07-09
CVE-2026-15193 AidanPark openclaw-android Android WebView Bridge JsBridge.kt os command injection — openclaw-android 5.3 Medium2026-07-09
CVE-2026-58459 gpsd gpsprof Command Injection via gnuplot plot title subtype field — gpsd 7.8 High2026-07-09
CVE-2026-55849 @cyclonedx/cyclonedx-npm: Shell Injection via Unsanitized `--workspace` Argument — cyclonedx-node-npm--2026-07-08
CVE-2026-60102 Horde VFS < 3.0.1 OS Command Injection via Horde_Vfs_Smb Driver — Vfs 8.8 High2026-07-08
CVE-2026-54344 ToolJet GitHub Actions comment body shell injection exposes deployment secrets — ToolJet 4.7 Medium2026-07-08
CVE-2026-15033 christopherthielen check-peer-dependencies peerDependencies packageUtils.js shelljs.exec os command injection — check-peer-dependencies 6.3 Medium2026-07-08
CVE-2026-44454 Coder vulnerable to workspace auto-creation via crafted URL parameters without user consent — coder 8.1 High2026-07-07

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) represent 3330 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.