Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2740

2740 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-78 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs operating system commands using untrusted external data without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious shell metacharacters, such as semicolons or pipes, into user-supplied fields like form inputs or URL parameters. This manipulation allows the attacker to alter the intended command structure, enabling arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise. To mitigate this risk, developers must strictly avoid passing user input directly to OS command interpreters. Instead, they should utilize safe, language-specific APIs that do not invoke the shell, or implement rigorous input validation and parameterization techniques. By treating all external data as inherently untrusted and applying strict allow-list filtering, organizations can effectively neutralize special elements and prevent command injection vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage. There are at least two subtypes of OS command injection: The application intends to execute a single, fixed program that is under its own control. It intends to use externally-supplied inputs as arguments to that program. For example, the program might use system("nslookup [HOSTNAME]") to run nslookup and allow the user to supply a HOSTNAME, which is used as an argument. Attackers cannot prevent nslookup from executing. However, if the program does not remove command separators from the HOSTNAME argument, attackers could place the separators into the arguments, which allows them to execute their own program afte…
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-RepudiationExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Hide Activities
Attackers could execute unauthorized operating system commands, which could then be used to disable the product, or read and modify data for which the attacker does not have permissions to access directly. Since the targeted application is directly executing the commands instead of the attacker, any…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Architecture and Design, OperationRun the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For ex…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and DesignFor any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Examples (2)
This example code intends to take the name of a user and list the contents of that user's home directory. It is subject to the first variant of OS command injection.
$userName = $_POST["user"]; $command = 'ls -l /home/' . $userName; system($command);
Bad · PHP
;rm -rf /
Attack
The following simple program accepts a filename as a command line argument and displays the contents of the file back to the user. The program is installed setuid root because it is intended for use as a learning tool to allow system administrators in-training to inspect privileged system files without giving them the ability to modify them or damage the system.
int main(int argc, char** argv) { char cmd[CMD_MAX] = "/usr/bin/cat "; strcat(cmd, argv[1]); system(cmd); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-20036 Cisco UCS Manager Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Unified Computing System (Managed) 6.5 Medium2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27848 Missing neutralization in Linksys MR9600, Linksys MX4200 — MR9600 9.8AICriticalAI2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27626 OliveTin vulnerable to OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks — OliveTin 10.0 Critical2026-02-25
CVE-2026-22553 InSAT MasterSCADA BUK-TS OS Command Injection — MasterSCADA BUK-TS 9.8 Critical2026-02-24
CVE-2026-23678 Binardat 10G08-0800GSM Network Switch Traceroute CLI Command Injection — 10G08-0800GSM Network Switch 8.8 High2026-02-24
CVE-2026-3102 exiftool PNG File MacOS.pm SetMacOSTags os command injection — exiftool 6.3 Medium2026-02-24
CVE-2026-3101 Intelbras TIP 635G Ping os command injection — TIP 635G 6.3 Medium2026-02-24
CVE-2026-27208 api-gateway-deploy Affected by Exploitable Command Injection via Unprivileged Root Execution — api-gateway-deploy 9.2 Critical2026-02-24
CVE-2026-1459 Zyxel VMG3625-T50B 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — VMG3625-T50B firmware 7.2 High2026-02-24
CVE-2025-13943 Zyxel EX3301-T0 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — EX3301-T0 firmware 8.8 High2026-02-24
CVE-2025-13942 Zyxel EX3510-B0 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — EX3510-B0 firmware 9.8 Critical2026-02-24
CVE-2026-26331 yt-dlp: Arbitrary Command Injection when using the `--netrc-cmd` option — yt-dlp 8.8 High2026-02-24
CVE-2026-3040 DrayTek Vigor 300B Web Management uploadlangs cgiGetFile os command injection — Vigor 300B 4.7 Medium2026-02-23
CVE-2026-2952 Vaelsys HTTP POST Request tree_server.php os command injection — Vaelsys 7.3 High2026-02-22
CVE-2026-2944 Tosei Online Store Management System ネット店舗管理システム HTTP POST Request monitor.php system os command injection — Online Store Management System ネット店舗管理システム 7.3 High2026-02-22
CVE-2026-27487 OpenClaw: Prevent shell injection in macOS keychain credential write — openclaw 7.6 High2026-02-21
CVE-2026-26046 Moodle: moodle: improper input sanitization in tex filter administration setting 7.2 High2026-02-21
CVE-2019-25441 thesystem 1.0 Command Injection via run_command endpoint — thesystem 9.8 Critical2026-02-20
CVE-2026-2041 Nagios Host zabbixagent_configwizard_func Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Host 8.8AIHighAI2026-02-20
CVE-2026-2043 Nagios Host esensors_websensor_configwizard_func Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Host 8.8AIHighAI2026-02-20
CVE-2026-2042 Nagios Host monitoringwizard Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Host 8.8AIHighAI2026-02-20
CVE-2026-2035 Deciso OPNsense diag_backup.php filename Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — OPNsense 8.0AIHighAI2026-02-20
CVE-2026-27113 Liquid Prompt arbitrary command injection via crafted Git branch names in gitstatusd backend — liquidprompt 6.3 Medium2026-02-20
CVE-2026-27190 Deno has a Command Injection via Incomplete shell metacharacter blocklist in node:child_process — deno 8.1 High2026-02-20
CVE-2026-2847 UTT HiPER 520 Web Management formReleaseConnect sub_44EFB4 os command injection — HiPER 520 7.2 High2026-02-20
CVE-2026-2846 UTT HiPER 520 Web Management formPdbUpConfig sub_44D264 os command injection — HiPER 520 7.2 High2026-02-20
CVE-2021-35402 ProLink PRC2402M 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — PRC2402M 10.0 Critical2026-02-20
CVE-2026-26323 OpenClaw has a command injection in maintainer clawtributors updater — openclaw 8.8 -2026-02-19
CVE-2026-27476 RustFly 2.0.0 Command Injection via UDP Remote Control — RustFly 9.8 Critical2026-02-19
CVE-2026-26318 systeminformation has Command Injection via Unsanitized `locate` Output in `versions()` — systeminformation 8.8 High2026-02-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) represent 2740 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.