目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CWE-787 跨界内存写 类漏洞列表 2488

CWE-787 跨界内存写 类弱点 2488 条 CVE 漏洞汇总,含 AI 中文分析。

CWE-787 越界写入是一种严重的内存安全漏洞,指程序向缓冲区边界之外或起始位置之前写入数据。攻击者利用此缺陷可覆盖相邻内存,导致程序崩溃、数据损坏,甚至通过精心构造的 payload 实现任意代码执行,从而完全控制目标系统。开发者应避免此类风险,需严格实施边界检查,使用安全的内存管理函数,启用编译器防护机制,并遵循最小权限原则,确保所有内存访问均在合法范围内。

MITRE CWE 官方描述
CWE:CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write 英文:The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. 译文:产品将数据写入预期缓冲区(buffer)的末尾之外或起始位置之前。
常见影响 (3)
IntegrityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
OtherUnexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
缓解措施 (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
代码示例 (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE ID标题CVSS风险等级Published
CVE-2021-45057 Adobe InDesign 缓冲区错误漏洞 — InDesign 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-45058 Adobe InDesign 缓冲区错误漏洞 — InDesign 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-45056 Adobe Incopy 缓冲区错误漏洞 — InCopy 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-45053 Adobe Incopy 缓冲区错误漏洞 — InCopy 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-32998 FANUC Robotics Virtual Robot Controller 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R-30iA, R-30iA Mate 8.1 -2022-01-07
CVE-2021-43554 winproladder缓冲区错误漏洞 — WinProladder 7.8 High2021-12-28
CVE-2021-38419 Fuji Electric V-Server Lite 缓冲区错误漏洞 — V-Server Lite 7.8 High2021-12-20
CVE-2021-44181 Adobe Dimension 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Dimension 7.8 -2021-12-20
CVE-2021-44180 Adobe Dimension 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Dimension 7.8 -2021-12-20
CVE-2021-43024 Adobe Premiere Rush 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Premiere Rush 7.8 High2021-12-20
CVE-2021-44790 Apache HTTP Server 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Apache HTTP Server 9.8 -2021-12-20
CVE-2021-44449 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44446 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44443 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44441 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44438 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44437 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44434 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44430 Siemens JT Utilities 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44013 Siemens Jt2go 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44005 Siemens Jt2go 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44006 Siemens Jt2go Jt2go缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44002 Siemens JT2GO和Siemens Teamcenter Visualization 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT Open 7.8 High2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44001 Siemens Jt2go和Siemens Teamcenter Visualization 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-42024 Siemens Simcenter STAR-CCM+ 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Simcenter STAR-CCM+ Viewer 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-43814 Rizin 缓冲区错误漏洞 — rizin 7.7 High2021-12-13
CVE-2021-42707 Wecon Plc Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PLC Editor 7.8 High2021-11-22
CVE-2021-42727 Adobe RoboHelp 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Bridge 7.8 High2021-11-22
CVE-2021-42524 Adobe Animate 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Animate 7.8 -2021-11-18
CVE-2021-42272 Adobe Animate 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Animate 7.8 -2021-11-18

CWE-787(跨界内存写) 是常见的弱点类别,本平台收录该类弱点关联的 2488 条 CVE 漏洞。