Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-787 (跨界内存写) — Vulnerability Class 2200

2200 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-787 represents a critical memory management weakness where software incorrectly writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a buffer. This flaw typically arises from insufficient bounds checking, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations with malicious payloads. Exploitation often leads to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or privilege escalation by corrupting critical system structures or control flow data. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation and utilizing safe programming practices that enforce strict boundary checks before any memory operation. Employing modern languages with automatic memory management, such as Rust or Java, further reduces exposure by preventing direct pointer arithmetic. Additionally, static analysis tools and fuzzing techniques help identify potential out-of-bounds conditions during the development lifecycle, ensuring that buffer operations remain within their intended limits and preserving application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (3)
IntegrityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
OtherUnexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-6033 Memory Corruption issue in XML_Serialize() in NI Circuit Design Suite — Circuit Design Suite 7.8 High2025-09-30
CVE-2025-9903 Canon多款产品 安全漏洞 — Generic Plus PCL6 Printer Driver 5.9 Medium2025-09-29
CVE-2024-48014 Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite 缓冲区错误漏洞 — BSAFE Micro Edition Suite 7.5 High2025-09-25
CVE-2025-23275 NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 4.2 Medium2025-09-24
CVE-2025-23328 NVIDIA Triton Inference Server 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Triton Inference Server 7.5 High2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7996 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt AR File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7998 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt CO File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7988 Ashlar-Vellum Graphite VC6 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Graphite 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7987 Ashlar-Vellum Graphite VC6 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Graphite 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7986 Ashlar-Vellum Graphite VC6 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Graphite 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7990 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt VC6 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7980 Ashlar-Vellum Graphite VC6 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Graphite 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-9242 WatchGuard Firebox iked Out of Bounds Write Vulnerability — Fireware OS 9.8AICriticalAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-8893 PDF File Parsing Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability — Revit 7.8 High2025-09-16
CVE-2025-54243 Substance3D - Viewer | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Substance3D - Viewer 7.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-54245 Substance3D - Viewer | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) — Substance3D - Viewer 7.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-0034 AMD Graphics Driver 安全漏洞 — AMD Instinct™ MI300X 4.7 Medium2025-09-06
CVE-2025-0010 AMD Graphics Driver 安全漏洞 — AMD Radeon™ RX 5000 Series Graphics Products 6.1 Medium2025-09-06
CVE-2021-26383 AMD多款产品 安全漏洞 — AMD Ryzen™ 5000 Series Mobile Processors with Radeon™ Graphics 7.9 High2025-09-05
CVE-2025-57807 ImageMagick BlobStream Forward-Seek Under-Allocation — ImageMagick 3.8 Low2025-09-05
CVE-2025-9275 Oxford Instruments Imaris Viewer IMS File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Imaris Viewer 7.8 -2025-09-02
CVE-2025-9809 libretro-common 安全漏洞 — libretro-common 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-01
CVE-2025-20704 MediaTek Modem 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MT6813, MT6835, MT6835T, MT6878, MT6878M, MT6897, MT6899, MT6991, MT8676, MT8678, MT8792, MT8863, MT8873, MT8883 8.0AIHighAI2025-09-01
CVE-2025-20708 MediaTek Modem 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MT2735, MT2737, MT6813, MT6815, MT6833, MT6833P, MT6835, MT6835T, MT6853, MT6853T, MT6855, MT6855T, MT6873, MT6875, MT6875T, MT6877, MT6877T, MT6877TT, MT6878, MT6878M, MT6879, MT6880, MT6883, MT6885, MT6886, MT6889, MT6890, MT6891, MT6893, MT6895, MT6895TT, MT6896, MT6897, MT6899, MT6980, MT6980D, MT6983, MT6983T, MT6985, MT6985T, MT6989, MT6989T, MT6990, MT6991, MT8673, MT8675, MT8676, MT8678, MT8771, MT8791, MT8791T, MT8792, MT8795T, MT8797, MT8798, MT8863, MT8873, MT8883, MT8893 9.8AICriticalAI2025-09-01
CVE-2025-30273 QTS, QuTS hero — QTS 9.1 -2025-08-29
CVE-2025-9340 native encrypt/decrypt operations in JCE may corrupt data if same byte array used for input and output. — Bouncy Castle for Java 9.8AICriticalAI2025-08-22
CVE-2010-20115 Vermillion FTP <= 1.31 Daemon PORT Command Memory Corruption — Vermillion FTP Daemon 9.8AICriticalAI2025-08-21
CVE-2025-4877 Libssh: write beyond bounds in binary to base64 conversion functions 4.5 Medium2025-08-20
CVE-2025-9132 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2025-08-20
CVE-2025-53705 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt, Xenon, Argon, Lithium, Cobalt Share Out-of-bounds Write — Cobalt 7.8 High2025-08-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写) represent 2200 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.