Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-783 (操作符优先级逻辑错误) — Vulnerability Class 6

6 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-783 (操作符优先级逻辑错误). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-783 represents a logic error weakness where software incorrectly interprets an expression due to misunderstandings of operator precedence rules. This flaw typically arises when developers assume a specific evaluation order that differs from the language’s actual standard, leading to unintended computational results. In security-critical contexts, such as authentication checks or access control decisions, attackers can exploit this discrepancy to bypass security mechanisms, effectively gaining unauthorized access or escalating privileges. To prevent these vulnerabilities, developers must explicitly use parentheses to enforce the intended order of operations, ensuring that complex boolean or arithmetic expressions are evaluated exactly as designed. Rigorous code reviews and static analysis tools that flag ambiguous precedence patterns further mitigate the risk, ensuring that logical intent aligns with execution behavior in critical security pathways.

MITRE CWE Description
The product uses an expression in which operator precedence causes incorrect logic to be used. While often just a bug, operator precedence logic errors can have serious consequences if they are used in security-critical code, such as making an authentication decision.
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, AvailabilityVaries by Context, Unexpected State
The consequences will vary based on the context surrounding the incorrect precedence. In a security decision, integrity or confidentiality are the most likely results. Otherwise, a crash may occur due to the software reaching an unexpected state.
Mitigations (1)
ImplementationRegularly wrap sub-expressions in parentheses, especially in security-critical code.
Examples (2)
In the following example, the method validateUser makes a call to another method to authenticate a username and password for a user and returns a success or failure code.
#define FAIL 0 #define SUCCESS 1 ... int validateUser(char *username, char *password) { int isUser = FAIL; // call method to authenticate username and password // if authentication fails then return failure otherwise return success if (isUser = AuthenticateUser(username, password) == FAIL) { return isUser; } else { isUser = SUCCESS; } return isUser; }
Bad · C
... if ((isUser = AuthenticateUser(username, password)) == FAIL) { ...
Good · C
In this example, the method calculates the return on investment for an accounting/financial application. The return on investment is calculated by subtracting the initial investment costs from the current value and then dividing by the initial investment costs.
public double calculateReturnOnInvestment(double currentValue, double initialInvestment) { double returnROI = 0.0; // calculate return on investment returnROI = currentValue - initialInvestment / initialInvestment; return returnROI; }
Bad · Java
... returnROI = (currentValue - initialInvestment) / initialInvestment; ...
Good · Java

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-783 (操作符优先级逻辑错误) represent 6 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.