Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-648 (特权API的不正确使用) — Vulnerability Class 57

57 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-648 (特权API的不正确使用). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-648 represents a critical implementation flaw where software fails to adhere to the specific security requirements mandated by privileged application programming interfaces. This weakness typically arises when developers invoke functions requiring elevated privileges without properly validating the caller’s context or ensuring that all preconditions are met, such as verifying user permissions or sanitizing input data. Attackers exploit this gap by manipulating the execution environment to trigger these sensitive operations under unauthorized conditions, effectively bypassing access controls to gain higher system privileges. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must rigorously implement strict validation checks before invoking privileged APIs, ensuring that all assumptions regarding the caller’s identity and state are explicitly verified. Adhering to the API’s documented security protocols and employing defense-in-depth strategies further mitigates the risk of unintended privilege escalation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not conform to the API requirements for a function call that requires extra privileges. This could allow attackers to gain privileges by causing the function to be called incorrectly. When a product contains certain functions that perform operations requiring an elevated level of privilege, the caller of a privileged API must be careful to: ensure that assumptions made by the APIs are valid, such as validity of arguments account for known weaknesses in the design/implementation of the API call the API from a safe context If the caller of the API does not follow these requirements, then it may allow a malicious user or process to elevate their privilege, hijack the process, or steal sensitive data. For instance, it is important to know if privileged APIs do not shed their privileges before returning to the caller or if the privileged function might make certain assumptions about the data, context or state information passed to it by the caller. It is important to always know when and how privileged APIs can be called in order to ensure that their elevated level of privilege cannot be exploited.
Common Consequences (3)
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
An attacker may be able to elevate privileges.
ConfidentialityRead Application Data
An attacker may be able to obtain sensitive information.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker may be able to execute code.
Mitigations (5)
ImplementationBefore calling privileged APIs, always ensure that the assumptions made by the privileged code hold true prior to making the call.
Architecture and DesignKnow architecture and implementation weaknesses of the privileged APIs and make sure to account for these weaknesses before calling the privileged APIs to ensure that they can be called safely.
ImplementationIf privileged APIs make certain assumptions about data, context or state validity that are passed by the caller, the calling code must ensure that these assumptions have been validated prior to making the call.
ImplementationIf privileged APIs do not shed their privilege prior to returning to the calling code, then calling code needs to shed these privileges immediately and safely right after the call to the privileged APIs. In particular, the calling code needs to ensure that a privileged thread of execution will never be returned to the user or made available to user-controlled processes.
ImplementationOnly call privileged APIs from safe, consistent and expected state.
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-41386 OpenClaw < 2026.3.22 - Privilege Escalation via Unbound Bootstrap Setup Codes — OpenClaw 9.1 Critical2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41329 OpenClaw < 2026.3.31 - Sandbox Bypass via Heartbeat Context Inheritance and senderIsOwner Escalation — OpenClaw 9.9 Critical2026-04-20
CVE-2026-35669 OpenClaw < 2026.3.25 - Privilege Escalation via Gateway Plugin HTTP Authentication Scope — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-04-10
CVE-2026-35663 OpenClaw < 2026.3.25 - Privilege Escalation via Backend Reconnect Scope Self-Claim — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-04-10
CVE-2026-35645 OpenClaw < 2026.3.25 - Privilege Escalation via Synthetic operator.admin in deleteSession — OpenClaw 8.1 High2026-04-09
CVE-2026-35639 OpenClaw < 2026.3.22 - Privilege Escalation via device.pair.approve Scope Validation — OpenClaw 8.8 High2026-04-09
CVE-2026-35625 OpenClaw < 2026.3.25 - Privilege Escalation via Silent Local Shared-Auth Reconnect — OpenClaw 7.8 High2026-04-09
CVE-2026-20122 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Arbitrary File Overwrite Vulnerability — Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager 5.4 Medium2026-02-25
CVE-2026-20126 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager 8.8 High2026-02-25
CVE-2026-22922 Apache Airflow: Airflow externalLogUrl Permission Bypass — Apache Airflow 4.3AIMediumAI2026-02-09
CVE-2025-1161 Improper Authorization in Nomysoft Informatics' Nomysem — Nomysem 7.1 High2025-12-10
CVE-2024-32008 Siemens Spectrum Power 安全漏洞 — Spectrum Power 4 7.8 High2025-11-11
CVE-2025-54768 KL-001-2025-015: Xorux LPAR2RRD Read Only User Log Download Exposing Sensitive Information — LPAR2RRD 4.3AIMediumAI2025-07-28
CVE-2025-54767 KL-001-2025-014: Xorux LPAR2RRD Read Only User Denial of Service — LPAR2RRD 6.5AIMediumAI2025-07-28
CVE-2025-54765 KL-001-2025-013: Xorux XorMon-NG Web Application Privilege Escalation to Administrator — XorMon-NG 8.8AIHighAI2025-07-28
CVE-2025-54766 KL-001-2025-012: Xorux XorMon-NG Read Only User Export Device Configuration Exposing Sensitive Information — XorMon-NG 6.5AIMediumAI2025-07-28
CVE-2025-5997 Privilege Escalation in Beamsec PhishPro — PhishPro 8.8 High2025-07-28
CVE-2025-7344 Digiwin|EAI - Privilege Escalation — EAI 8.8 High2025-07-21
CVE-2025-23375 Dell PowerProtect Data Manager Reporting 安全漏洞 — PowerProtect Data Manager 7.8 High2025-04-28
CVE-2022-26323 Incorrect Use of Privileged vulnerability has been discovered on OpenText™ UCMDB and Operation Bridge Manager product. — Operations Bridge Manager 8.8AIHighAI2025-04-17
CVE-2025-2311 Authentication Bypass in Sechard Information Technologies' SecHard — SecHard 9.0 Critical2025-03-20
CVE-2024-53007 Bentley Systems ProjectWise Integration Server 安全漏洞 — ProjectWise Integration Server 6.4 Medium2025-01-31
CVE-2024-8785 WhatsUp Gold Registry Overwrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — WhatsUp Gold 9.8 Critical2024-12-02
CVE-2024-11068 D-Link DSL6740C - Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs — DSL6740C 9.8 Critical2024-11-11
CVE-2024-46978 Missing checks for notification filter preferences editions in XWiki Platform — xwiki-platform 6.5 Medium2024-09-18
CVE-2023-6522 Information Disclosure in ExtremePacs's Extreme XDS — Extreme XDS 7.2 High2024-04-05
CVE-2023-4993 Sensetive Data Exposure in Utarit's Soliclub — SoliPay Mobile App 7.5 High2024-02-15
CVE-2024-22042 Siemens Unicam FX 安全漏洞 — Unicam FX 7.8 High2024-02-13
CVE-2023-6151 Information Disclosure in Eskom E-municipality — e-municipality module 7.5 High2023-11-28
CVE-2023-6150 Information Disclosure in Eskom E-municipality — e-municipality module 7.5 High2023-11-28

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-648 (特权API的不正确使用) represent 57 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.