Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) — Vulnerability Class 1073

1073 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-639 represents an authorization bypass weakness where systems fail to validate that a user is permitted to access a resource identified by a user-controlled key. Attackers typically exploit this by manipulating identifiers, such as changing a numeric user ID in a URL or API parameter, to retrieve or modify another user’s private data. This insecure direct object reference allows unauthorized access without requiring authentication bypasses. Developers prevent this vulnerability by implementing robust server-side authorization checks that verify the requesting user’s permissions against the requested resource, rather than trusting client-supplied identifiers. Additionally, using indirect references or opaque tokens instead of predictable, sequential keys can mitigate the risk of enumeration and unauthorized access attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Retrieval of a user record occurs in the system based on some key value that is under user control. The key would typically identify a user-related record stored in the system and would be used to lookup that record for presentation to the user. It is likely that an attacker would have to be an authenticated user in the system. However, the authorization process would not properly check the data access operation to ensure that the authenticated user performing the operation has sufficient entitlements to perform the requested data access, hence bypassing any other authorization checks present in the system. For example, attackers can look at places where user specific data is retrieved (e.g. search screens) and determine whether the key for the item being looked up is controllable externally. The key may be a hidden field in the HTML form field, might be passed as a URL parameter or as an unencrypted cookie variable, then in each of these cases it will be possible to tamper with the key value. One manifestation of this weakness is when a system uses sequential or otherwise easily-guessable session IDs that would allow one user to easily switch to another user's session and read/modify their data.
Common Consequences (3)
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
Access control checks for specific user data or functionality can be bypassed.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Horizontal escalation of privilege is possible (one user can view/modify information of another user).
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Vertical escalation of privilege is possible if the user-controlled key is actually a flag that indicates administrator status, allowing the attacker to gain administrative access.
Mitigations (3)
Architecture and DesignFor each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design, ImplementationMake sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and DesignUse encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
Examples (1)
The following code uses a parameterized statement, which escapes metacharacters and prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities, to construct and execute a SQL query that searches for an invoice matching the specified identifier [1]. The identifier is selected from a list of all invoices associated with the current authenticated user.
... conn = new SqlConnection(_ConnectionString); conn.Open(); int16 id = System.Convert.ToInt16(invoiceID.Text); SqlCommand query = new SqlCommand( "SELECT * FROM invoices WHERE id = @id", conn); query.Parameters.AddWithValue("@id", id); SqlDataReader objReader = objCommand.ExecuteReader(); ...
Bad · C#
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-11517 Event Tickets and Registration <= 5.26.5 - Unauthenticated Ticket Payment Bypass — Event Tickets and Registration 7.5 High2025-10-18
CVE-2025-11895 Binary MLM Plan <= 5.0 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Insecure Direct Object Reference — Binary MLM Plan 4.3 Medium2025-10-17
CVE-2024-56143 Strapi Allows Unauthorized Access to Private Fields via parms.lookup — strapi 8.2 High2025-10-16
CVE-2025-9559 Pega Platform versions 8.7.5 to Infinity 24.2.2 are affected by a Insecure Direct Object Reference issue in a user interface component that can only be used to read data — Pega Infinity 6.5 Medium2025-10-16
CVE-2025-41020 Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Sergestec's Exito — Exito 6.5AIMediumAI2025-10-16
CVE-2025-10742 Truelysell Core <= 1.8.6 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary User Password Change — Truelysell Core 9.8 Critical2025-10-16
CVE-2025-11176 Quick Featured Images <= 13.7.2 - Insecure Direct Object Reference to Image Manipulation — Quick Featured Images 4.3 Medium2025-10-15
CVE-2025-40773 Siemens SiPass integrated 安全漏洞 — SiPass integrated 3.5 Low2025-10-14
CVE-2025-62252 Liferay Portal和Liferay DXP 安全漏洞 — Portal 6.5AIMediumAI2025-10-13
CVE-2025-62241 Liferay DXP 安全漏洞 — DXP 4.3AIMediumAI2025-10-13
CVE-2025-62242 Liferay Portal和Liferay DXP 安全漏洞 — Portal 4.3AIMediumAI2025-10-13
CVE-2025-62244 Liferay Portal和Liferay DXP 安全漏洞 — Portal 6.5AIMediumAI2025-10-13
CVE-2025-9902 IDOR in Akınsoft QRMenu — QRMenu 7.5 High2025-10-13
CVE-2025-31997 HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) — Unica Centralized Offer Management 4.2 Medium2025-10-12
CVE-2025-11518 WPC Smart Wishlist for WooCommerce <= 5.0.3 - Insecure Direct Object Reference to Unauthenticated Wishlist Manipulation — WPC Smart Wishlist for WooCommerce 5.3 Medium2025-10-11
CVE-2025-8887 IDOR in Usta Information Systems' Aybs Interaktif — Aybs Interaktif 6.1 Medium2025-10-10
CVE-2025-61779 Trustee's attestation-policy endpoint is not protected by admin autentication — trustee 4.3AIMediumAI2025-10-09
CVE-2025-6038 Lisfinity Core - Lisfinity Core plugin used for pebas® Lisfinity WordPress theme <= 1.4.0 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Privilege Escalation — Lisfinity Core - Lisfinity Core plugin used for pebas® Lisfinity WordPress theme 8.8 High2025-10-09
CVE-2025-43724 Dell PowerScale OneFS 安全漏洞 — PowerScale OneFS 4.4 Medium2025-10-08
CVE-2025-40676 Múltiples vulnerabilidades en Negotiator de BBMRI-ERIC — Negotiator 7.1AIHighAI2025-10-07
CVE-2025-0606 IDOR in Logo Software's Logo Cloud — Logo Cloud 6.0 Medium2025-10-06
CVE-2025-11321 zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education WrongBookController.java authorization — wisdom-education 4.3 Medium2025-10-06
CVE-2025-43827 Liferay Portal和Liferay DXP 安全漏洞 — Portal 6.5AIMediumAI2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41098 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 8.3 -2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41099 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 4.3 -2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41097 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 4.3 -2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41096 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 4.3 -2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41095 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 4.3 -2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41094 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 6.5 -2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41093 Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner — BOLD Workplanner 6.5 -2025-09-30

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) represent 1073 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.