Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-416 (释放后使用) — Vulnerability Class 2435

2435 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-416 (释放后使用). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-416, Use After Free, is a critical memory safety weakness occurring when a program continues to reference a memory location after it has been deallocated. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by freeing an object and then rapidly reallocating that same memory block with attacker-controlled data. Because the original pointer still points to the now-invalid address, the application may inadvertently execute malicious code or corrupt memory structures, often leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service. To prevent this, developers must rigorously manage memory lifecycles by nullifying pointers immediately after freeing them, ensuring no dangling references remain. Utilizing modern programming languages with automatic garbage collection or employing static analysis tools to detect invalid memory accesses further mitigates the risk, ensuring that freed memory is never accessed again during the program’s execution.

MITRE CWE Description
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Common Consequences (4)
IntegrityModify Memory
The use of previously freed memory may corrupt valid data, if the memory area in question has been allocated and used properly elsewhere.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
If chunk consolidation occurs after the use of previously freed data, the process may crash when invalid data is used as chunk information.
ConfidentialityRead Memory
Read operations on freed memory can sometimes leak sensitive information instead of causing a crash
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If malicious data is entered before chunk consolidation can take place, it may be possible to take advantage of a write-what-where primitive to execute arbitrary code. If the newly allocated data happens to hold a class, in C++ for example, various function pointers may be scattered within the heap …
Mitigations (2)
Architecture and DesignChoose a language that provides automatic memory management.
ImplementationWhen freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #define BUFSIZER1 512 #define BUFSIZER2 ((BUFSIZER1/2) - 8) int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf1R1; char *buf2R1; char *buf2R2; char *buf3R2; buf1R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); buf2R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); free(buf2R1); buf2R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); buf3R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); strncpy(buf2R1, argv[1], BUFSIZER1-1); free(buf1R1); free(buf2R2); free(buf3R2); }
Bad · C
The following code illustrates a use after free error:
char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE); if (err) { abrt = 1; free(ptr); } ... if (abrt) { logError("operation aborted before commit", ptr); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2019-5042 Aspose.PDF for C++ 资源管理错误漏洞 — Aspose.PDF for C++ 9.8 -2019-09-18
CVE-2019-5067 Aspose.PDF for C++ 资源管理错误漏洞 — Aspose 9.8 -2019-09-18
CVE-2019-5066 Aspose.PDF for C++ 资源管理错误漏洞 — Aspose 9.8 -2019-09-18
CVE-2017-14201 The shell DNS command can cause unpredictable results due to misuse of stack variables. — shell 7.8 -2019-08-29
CVE-2019-13514 Delta Electronics Industrial Automation DOPSoft 资源管理错误漏洞 — Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft 7.8 -2019-08-15
CVE-2019-13510 Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation Software 资源管理错误漏洞 — Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation Software versions 16.00.00 and earlier 7.8 -2019-08-15
CVE-2019-6822 Schneider Electric Zelio Soft 2 资源管理错误漏洞 — Zelio Soft 2 V5.2 and prior 7.8 -2019-07-15
CVE-2019-3896 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞 — kernel 7.8 -2019-06-18
CVE-2019-6757 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6758 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6761 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6762 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — PhantomPDF 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6763 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6766 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6767 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6768 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6769 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 7.8 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6770 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6771 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6772 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6773 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-6756 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF 资源管理错误漏洞 — PhantomPDF 5.5 -2019-06-03
CVE-2019-5018 SQLite 资源管理错误漏洞 — Sqlite3 8.1 -2019-05-10
CVE-2019-3885 Pacemaker 资源管理错误漏洞 — pacemaker 5.5 -2019-04-18
CVE-2019-6556 Omron CX-Programmer和Omron Common Components 资源管理错误漏洞 — CX-Programmer within CX-One 7.3 -2019-04-10
CVE-2019-3829 gnutls 资源管理错误漏洞 — gnutls 7.5 -2019-03-27
CVE-2019-3817 libcomps 资源管理错误漏洞 — libcomps 8.8 -2019-03-27
CVE-2019-6730 Foxit Reader和PhantomPD 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 8.8 -2019-03-19
CVE-2019-6734 Foxit Reader和Foxit PhantomPDF for Windows 资源管理错误漏洞 — PhantomPDF 6.5 -2019-03-19
CVE-2019-6727 Foxit Reader和PhantomPD 资源管理错误漏洞 — Reader 8.8 -2019-03-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-416 (释放后使用) represent 2435 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.