Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-416 (释放后使用) — Vulnerability Class 2490

2490 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-416 (释放后使用). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-416, Use After Free, is a critical memory safety weakness occurring when a program continues to reference a memory location after it has been deallocated. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by freeing an object and then rapidly reallocating that same memory block with attacker-controlled data. Because the original pointer still points to the now-invalid address, the application may inadvertently execute malicious code or corrupt memory structures, often leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service. To prevent this, developers must rigorously manage memory lifecycles by nullifying pointers immediately after freeing them, ensuring no dangling references remain. Utilizing modern programming languages with automatic garbage collection or employing static analysis tools to detect invalid memory accesses further mitigates the risk, ensuring that freed memory is never accessed again during the program’s execution.

MITRE CWE Description
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Common Consequences (4)
IntegrityModify Memory
The use of previously freed memory may corrupt valid data, if the memory area in question has been allocated and used properly elsewhere.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
If chunk consolidation occurs after the use of previously freed data, the process may crash when invalid data is used as chunk information.
ConfidentialityRead Memory
Read operations on freed memory can sometimes leak sensitive information instead of causing a crash
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If malicious data is entered before chunk consolidation can take place, it may be possible to take advantage of a write-what-where primitive to execute arbitrary code. If the newly allocated data happens to hold a class, in C++ for example, various function pointers may be scattered within the heap …
Mitigations (2)
Architecture and DesignChoose a language that provides automatic memory management.
ImplementationWhen freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #define BUFSIZER1 512 #define BUFSIZER2 ((BUFSIZER1/2) - 8) int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf1R1; char *buf2R1; char *buf2R2; char *buf3R2; buf1R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); buf2R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); free(buf2R1); buf2R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); buf3R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); strncpy(buf2R1, argv[1], BUFSIZER1-1); free(buf1R1); free(buf2R2); free(buf3R2); }
Bad · C
The following code illustrates a use after free error:
char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE); if (err) { abrt = 1; free(ptr); } ... if (abrt) { logError("operation aborted before commit", ptr); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2021-34922 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34919 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34917 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34911 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34909 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34908 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34906 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34895 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34894 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34891 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34886 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 3.3 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34884 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 3.3 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34879 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-34872 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2022-01-13
CVE-2021-45059 Adobe InDesign JPEG2000 Parsing Use-After-Free Information Disclosure Vulnerability — InDesign 3.3 Low2022-01-13
CVE-2021-45054 Adobe InCopy JPEG2000 Parsing Use-After-Free Information Disclosure Vulnerability — InCopy 3.3 Low2022-01-13
CVE-2022-0156 Use After Free in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 -2022-01-10
CVE-2021-41043 tcpslice 资源管理错误漏洞 — tcpslice 8.1 -2022-01-05
CVE-2021-4192 Use After Free in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 -2021-12-31
CVE-2021-4187 Use After Free in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 -2021-12-29
CVE-2021-4173 Use After Free in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 -2021-12-27
CVE-2021-44447 Siemens JT Utilities 资源管理错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44433 Siemens JT Utilities 资源管理错误漏洞 — JT Utilities 7.8 -2021-12-14
CVE-2021-44014 Siemens JT2GO 资源管理错误漏洞 — JT Open 7.8 High2021-12-14
CVE-2021-4069 Use After Free in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 -2021-12-06
CVE-2021-43790 Use After Free in lucet — lucet 8.5 High2021-11-29
CVE-2021-3962 ImageMagick 资源管理错误漏洞 — ImageMagick 7.8 -2021-11-19
CVE-2021-21900 LibreCAD 资源管理错误漏洞 — LibreCAD 8.8 -2021-11-19
CVE-2021-3974 Use After Free in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 -2021-11-19
CVE-2021-42269 Adobe Animate FLA File Parsing Use After Free Remote Code Execution — Animate 7.8 High2021-11-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-416 (释放后使用) represent 2490 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.