Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CWE-416 (释放后使用) — Vulnerability Class 2577

2577 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-416 (释放后使用). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-416, Use After Free, is a critical memory safety weakness occurring when a program continues to reference a memory location after it has been deallocated. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by freeing an object and then rapidly reallocating that same memory block with attacker-controlled data. Because the original pointer still points to the now-invalid address, the application may inadvertently execute malicious code or corrupt memory structures, often leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service. To prevent this, developers must rigorously manage memory lifecycles by nullifying pointers immediately after freeing them, ensuring no dangling references remain. Utilizing modern programming languages with automatic garbage collection or employing static analysis tools to detect invalid memory accesses further mitigates the risk, ensuring that freed memory is never accessed again during the program’s execution.

MITRE CWE Description
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Common Consequences (4)
IntegrityModify Memory
The use of previously freed memory may corrupt valid data, if the memory area in question has been allocated and used properly elsewhere.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
If chunk consolidation occurs after the use of previously freed data, the process may crash when invalid data is used as chunk information.
ConfidentialityRead Memory
Read operations on freed memory can sometimes leak sensitive information instead of causing a crash
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If malicious data is entered before chunk consolidation can take place, it may be possible to take advantage of a write-what-where primitive to execute arbitrary code. If the newly allocated data happens to hold a class, in C++ for example, various function pointers may be scattered within the heap …
Mitigations (2)
Architecture and DesignChoose a language that provides automatic memory management.
ImplementationWhen freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #define BUFSIZER1 512 #define BUFSIZER2 ((BUFSIZER1/2) - 8) int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf1R1; char *buf2R1; char *buf2R2; char *buf3R2; buf1R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); buf2R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); free(buf2R1); buf2R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); buf3R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); strncpy(buf2R1, argv[1], BUFSIZER1-1); free(buf1R1); free(buf2R2); free(buf3R2); }
Bad · C
The following code illustrates a use after free error:
char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE); if (err) { abrt = 1; free(ptr); } ... if (abrt) { logError("operation aborted before commit", ptr); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-28285 Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 for Mac 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-24914 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 11 version 22H2 7.0 High2023-04-11
CVE-2022-43716 Siemens SIMATIC CP443-1 OPC UA9 资源管理错误漏洞 — SIMATIC CP 1242-7 V2 7.5 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-1989 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞 — Kernel 7.0 -2023-04-11
CVE-2022-43664 JustSystems Ichitaro 资源管理错误漏洞 — Ichitaro 7.8 High2023-04-05
CVE-2023-1838 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞 — Kernel 7.1 -2023-04-05
CVE-2023-1855 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞 — Kernel 6.3 -2023-04-05
CVE-2022-33298 Use after free in Modem — Snapdragon 6.7 Medium2023-04-04
CVE-2023-1611 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞 — Kernel 7.1 -2023-04-03
CVE-2023-1393 X.org Server 资源管理错误漏洞 — xorg-server 7.8 -2023-03-30
CVE-2023-1670 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞 — Kernel 7.8 -2023-03-30
CVE-2022-37381 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28303 Bentley Systems Bentley View 资源管理错误漏洞 — View 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28310 Bentley Systems MicroStation 资源管理错误漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28641 Bentley Systems MicroStation 资源管理错误漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37359 PDF-XChange Editor 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37374 PDF-XChange Editor 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37378 Foxit PDF Editor 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Editor 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37379 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 5.5 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37382 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.1 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37384 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37385 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37387 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37389 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37390 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-37391 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-42430 Tesla 资源管理错误漏洞 — Model 3 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43637 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43638 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43639 Foxit PDF Reader 资源管理错误漏洞 — PDF Reader 7.8 -2023-03-29

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-416 (释放后使用) represent 2577 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.