Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-352 (跨站请求伪造(CSRF)) — Vulnerability Class 4777

4777 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-352 (跨站请求伪造(CSRF)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-352, Cross-Site Request Forgery, is a web application weakness where the system fails to verify that an incoming request was intentionally initiated by the authenticated user rather than an unauthorized actor. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by tricking a victim into submitting a malicious request, often via a hidden link or form on a third-party site, while the victim is logged into the target application. Because the browser automatically includes valid session cookies, the server processes the forged request as legitimate, potentially allowing unauthorized actions like fund transfers or profile changes. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing anti-CSRF tokens, synchronizer tokens, or validating the Origin and Referer headers to ensure requests originate from trusted sources, thereby preventing unauthorized state changes.

MITRE CWE Description
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation, Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
The consequences will vary depending on the nature of the functionality that is vulnerable to CSRF. An attacker could trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server via a URL, image load, XMLHttpRequest, etc., which would then be treated as an authentic request from the client…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
ImplementationEnsure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Architecture and DesignGenerate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Architecture and DesignIdentify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Architecture and DesignUse the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the f…
Examples (1)
This example PHP code attempts to secure the form submission process by validating that the user submitting the form has a valid session. A CSRF attack would not be prevented by this countermeasure because the attacker forges a request through the user's web browser in which a valid session already exists.
<form action="/url/profile.php" method="post"> <input type="text" name="firstname"/> <input type="text" name="lastname"/> <br/> <input type="text" name="email"/> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Update"/> </form>
Bad · HTML
// initiate the session in order to validate sessions session_start(); //if the session is registered to a valid user then allow update if (! session_is_registered("username")) { echo "invalid session detected!"; // Redirect user to login page [...] exit; } // The user session is valid, so process the request // and update the information update_profile(); function update_profile { // read in the data from $POST and send an update // to the database SendUpdateToDatabase($_SESSION['username'], $_POST['email']); [...] echo "Your profile has been successfully updated."; }
Bad · PHP
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2019-1658 Cisco Unified Intelligence Center Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Unified Intelligence Center 8.8 -2019-01-24
CVE-2018-16854 Moodle 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — moodle 8.8 -2018-11-26
CVE-2018-15445 Cisco Energy Management Suite Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Energy Management Suite 8.0 -2018-11-08
CVE-2018-15438 Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance 8.8 -2018-10-17
CVE-2018-15402 Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 8.8 -2018-10-17
CVE-2018-13800 Siemens SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family version 4 8.1 -2018-10-10
CVE-2018-0439 Cisco Meeting Server Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Meeting Server 8.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0444 Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability — Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise 6.1 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0445 Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise 8.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0446 Cisco Industrial Network Director Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Industrial Network Director 8.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0451 Cisco Tetration Analytics Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Tetration Analytics 8.0 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-15401 Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability — Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment 8.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-8844 Philips e-Alert 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — e-Alert Unit (non-medical device) 8.8 -2018-09-26
CVE-2018-15612 Orchestration Designer Runtime Config CSRF — Orchestration Designer 8.8 -2018-09-21
CVE-2016-7067 Tildeslash Monit Service Manager 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — monit 7.1 -2018-09-10
CVE-2018-10884 Ansible Tower 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — ansible-tower 8.8 -2018-08-22
CVE-2018-14783 NetComm Wireless G LTE Light Industrial M2M Router(NWL-25)跨站请求伪造漏洞 — NetComm Wireless G LTE Light Industrial M2M Router (NWL-25) with firmware 2.0.29.11 and prior. 8.8 -2018-08-10
CVE-2018-0413 Cisco Identity Services Engine 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — Cisco Identity Services Engine unknown 8.8 -2018-08-01
CVE-2017-3187 The dotCMS administration panel, versions 3.7.1 and earlier, are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery — Administration Panel 8.8 -2018-07-24
CVE-2016-6557 The ASUS RP-AC52 access point, firmware version 1.0.1.1s and possibly earlier, is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery — RP-AC52 Access Point 8.0 -2018-07-13
CVE-2016-6578 CodeLathe FileCloud, version 13.0.0.32841 and earlier, is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) — FileCloud 8.8 -2018-07-13
CVE-2018-12540 Eclipse Vert.x 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — Eclipse Vert.x 8.8 -2018-07-12
CVE-2018-10895 qutebrowser 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — cross-site request forgery flaw allows sites to access 'qute 8.8 -2018-07-12
CVE-2016-10522 rails_admin ruby 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — rails_admin ruby gem 8.8 -2018-07-05
CVE-2018-11448 Siemens SCALANCE M875 跨站脚本漏洞 — SCALANCE M875 4.8 -2018-06-26
CVE-2018-0363 Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service unknown 8.8 -2018-06-21
CVE-2018-0364 Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager unknown 8.8 -2018-06-21
CVE-2018-0365 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center unknown 8.8 -2018-06-21
CVE-2014-0594 CSRF protection incorrectly disabled — Open Build Service 8.8 -2018-06-08
CVE-2017-7906 ABB IP GATEWA 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — ABB IP GATEWAY 8.8 -2018-06-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-352 (跨站请求伪造(CSRF)) represent 4777 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.