Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-269 (特权管理不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 1016

1016 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-269 (特权管理不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-269 represents a critical access control weakness where software fails to properly assign, modify, track, or verify privileges for users or processes. This flaw allows actors to operate outside their intended security boundaries, effectively granting them an unintended sphere of control. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating session tokens, bypassing authentication checks, or leveraging insufficient authorization logic to escalate privileges from a standard user to an administrator. Such exploitation can lead to unauthorized data access, system modification, or complete compromise. To prevent this, developers must implement robust identity and access management frameworks that enforce strict least-privilege principles. Regularly auditing permission assignments, utilizing role-based access control, and rigorously validating user rights at every critical application checkpoint are essential strategies to ensure actors only possess the minimum necessary privileges for their specific tasks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
Common Consequences (1)
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Mitigations (3)
Architecture and Design, OperationVery carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Architecture and DesignFollow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
Architecture and DesignConsider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
Examples (2)
This code temporarily raises the program's privileges to allow creation of a new user folder.
def makeNewUserDir(username): if invalidUsername(username): #avoid CWE-22 and CWE-78 print('Usernames cannot contain invalid characters') return False try: raisePrivileges() os.mkdir('/home/' + username) lowerPrivileges() except OSError: print('Unable to create new user directory for user:' + username) return False return True
Bad · Python
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
seteuid(0); /* do some stuff */ seteuid(getuid());
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-21287 Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.8 High2025-01-14
CVE-2024-12398 Zyxel WBE530 安全漏洞 — WBE530 firmware 8.8 High2025-01-14
CVE-2024-11128 Insufficient Hardened Runtime or Library Validation signing in Bitdefender Virus Scanner for macOS — Virus Scanner 7.8 -2025-01-13
CVE-2024-53706 SonicWALL Gen7 SonicOS Cloud platform NSv 安全漏洞 — SonicOS 8.8 -2025-01-09
CVE-2024-56447 Huawei HarmonyOS 安全漏洞 — HarmonyOS 7.8 High2025-01-08
CVE-2025-22621 Privilege escalation for users who hold the “splunk_app_soar“ role in the Splunk App for SOAR — Splunk App for SOAR 6.4 Medium2025-01-07
CVE-2024-55632 Trend Micro Apex One 安全漏洞 — Trend Micro Apex One 7.8 High2024-12-31
CVE-2024-55631 Trend Micro Apex One 安全漏洞 — Trend Micro Apex One 7.8 High2024-12-31
CVE-2024-13058 Authenticated, non-admin users can create storage pools via the sifi API — HyperCloud 6.5 -2024-12-30
CVE-2020-9222 华为 FusionCompute 安全漏洞 — FusionCompute 7.0 High2024-12-27
CVE-2020-9080 华为产品安全漏洞 — HUAWEI Mate 20 Pro 7.8 High2024-12-27
CVE-2024-56335 Privilege escalation allows organization groups to be updated/deleted if their UUID is known in vaultwarden — vaultwarden 7.6 High2024-12-20
CVE-2024-12786 X1a0He Adobe Downloader XPC Service com.x1a0he.macOS.Adobe-Downloader.helper shouldAcceptNewConnection privileges management — Adobe Downloader 7.8 High2024-12-19
CVE-2020-15934 Fortinet FortiClient 安全漏洞 — FortiClientLinux 8.6 High2024-12-19
CVE-2024-38499 Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability in CA Client Automation 14.5 — CA Client Automation (ITCM) 6.5 -2024-12-17
CVE-2024-55949 Privilege escalation in IAM import API in MinIO — minio 8.8 -2024-12-16
CVE-2024-11721 Frontend Admin by DynamiApps <= 3.24.5 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation — Frontend Admin by DynamiApps 8.1 High2024-12-14
CVE-2024-49035 Partner.Microsoft.Com Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft Partner Center 8.7 High2024-11-26
CVE-2024-52336 Tuned: `script_pre` and `script_post` options allow to pass arbitrary scripts executed by root 7.8 High2024-11-26
CVE-2024-9941 WPGYM <= 67.1.0 - Missing Authorization to Authenticated (Subscriber+) Privilege Escalation — WPGYM - Wordpress Gym Management System 8.8 High2024-11-23
CVE-2020-26063 Cisco Integrated Management Controller Software Authorization Bypass Vulnerability — Cisco Unified Computing System (Managed) 5.4 Medium2024-11-18
CVE-2024-52926 Delinea Privilege Manager 安全漏洞 — Privilege Manager 6.5 Medium2024-11-18
CVE-2024-9192 WP Video Robot <= 1.20.0 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Privilege Escalation via User Meta Update — WordPress Video Robot - The Ultimate Video Importer 8.8 High2024-11-16
CVE-2024-52516 Nextcloud Server's shares are not removed when user is limited to share with in their groups and being removed from one of them — security-advisories 3.0 Low2024-11-15
CVE-2024-8068 Privilege escalation to NetworkService Account access — Citrix Session Recording 8.8AIHighAI2024-11-12
CVE-2024-49558 Dell SmartFabric OS10 安全漏洞 — SmartFabric OS10 Software 7.8 High2024-11-12
CVE-2024-24409 Privilege Escalation — ADManager Plus 8.8 High2024-11-08
CVE-2024-8424 WatchGuard Endpoint Protection Privilege Escalation in PSANHost Enables Arbitrary File Delete as SYSTEM — EPDR 7.8 High2024-11-07
CVE-2024-8810 Privilege Management vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed GitHub Apps to grant themselves write access — Enterprise Server 6.5AIMediumAI2024-11-07
CVE-2024-10203 Agent Arbitrary File Deletion — EndPoint Central 7.0 High2024-11-07

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-269 (特权管理不恰当) represent 1016 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.