Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) — Vulnerability Class 817

817 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-190 represents a critical logic flaw where arithmetic operations exceed the maximum capacity of the assigned integer data type, causing the value to wrap around to a negative number or zero. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating input values to trigger the overflow, thereby bypassing security checks that assume the resulting number remains positive or within expected bounds. This often leads to severe consequences such as buffer overflows, memory corruption, or unauthorized access. To prevent such issues, developers must implement rigorous input validation and use safe arithmetic libraries that detect potential overflows before execution. Additionally, employing static analysis tools and adhering to secure coding standards ensures that integer calculations are handled with appropriate bounds checking, effectively mitigating the risk of wraparound errors in production environments.

MITRE CWE Description
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Common Consequences (5)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
This weakness can generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. When the calculated result is used for resource allocation, this weakness can cause too many (or too few) resources to be allocated, possibly enabling crashes if the product requests more resources than can be provided.
IntegrityModify Memory
If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the overflow/wraparound results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.
Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows, which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy.
Availability, OtherAlter Execution Logic, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
If the overflow/wraparound occurs in a loop index variable, this could cause the loop to terminate at the wrong time - too early, too late, or not at all (i.e., infinite loops). With too many iterations, some loops could consume too many resources such as memory, file handles, etc., possibly leading…
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
If integer values are used in security-critical decisions, such as calculating quotas or allocation limits, integer overflows can be used to cause an incorrect security decision.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsEnsure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
ImplementationPerform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum…
ImplementationUnderstand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]…
Examples (2)
The following image processing code allocates a table for images.
img_t table_ptr; /*struct containing img data, 10kB each*/ int num_imgs; ... num_imgs = get_num_imgs(); table_ptr = (img_t*)malloc(sizeof(img_t)*num_imgs); ...
Bad · C
The following code excerpt from OpenSSH 3.3 demonstrates a classic case of integer overflow:
nresp = packet_get_int(); if (nresp > 0) { response = xmalloc(nresp*sizeof(char*)); for (i = 0; i < nresp; i++) response[i] = packet_get_string(NULL); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-40962 FFmpeg 安全漏洞 — FFmpeg 4.9 Medium2026-04-16
CVE-2026-6385 Ffmpeg: ffmpeg: denial of service and potential arbitrary code execution via signed integer overflow in dvd subtitle parser — Lightspeed Core 6.5 Medium2026-04-15
CVE-2026-40915 Gimp: gimp: heap buffer overflow due to integer overflow in fits image loader — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 5.5 Medium2026-04-15
CVE-2026-39811 Fortinet FortiWeb 输入验证错误漏洞 — FortiWeb 4.4 Medium2026-04-14
CVE-2026-34238 ImageMagick: Integer overflow in despeckle operation causes heap buffer overflow on 32-bit builds — ImageMagick 5.1 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-33900 ImageMagick has a Heap overflow caused by integer overflow/wraparound in viff encoder on 32-bit builds — ImageMagick 5.9 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-6192 uclouvain openjpeg pi.c opj_pi_initialise_encode integer overflow — openjpeg 3.3 Low2026-04-13
CVE-2026-40447 SAMSUNG Escargot 安全漏洞 — Escargot 5.1 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-25208 SAMSUNG Escargot 安全漏洞 — Escargot 8.1 High2026-04-13
CVE-2026-40385 Libexif 输入验证错误漏洞 — libexif 4.0 Medium2026-04-12
CVE-2026-4154 GIMP XPM File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP 7.8AIHighAI2026-04-11
CVE-2026-4151 GIMP ANI File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP 7.8AIHighAI2026-04-11
CVE-2026-4150 GIMP PSD File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP 7.8AIHighAI2026-04-11
CVE-2026-5477 Prefix-substitution forgery via integer overflow in wolfCrypt CMAC — wolfSSL 7.5 -2026-04-10
CVE-2026-40046 Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ MQTT: Missing fix for CVE-2025-66168: MQTT control packet remaining length field is not properly validated — Apache ActiveMQ 9.8AICriticalAI2026-04-09
CVE-2026-24173 NVIDIA Triton Inference Server 输入验证错误漏洞 — Triton Inference Server 7.5 High2026-04-07
CVE-2026-20889 Libraw 安全漏洞 — LibRaw 9.8 Critical2026-04-07
CVE-2026-24660 Libraw 安全漏洞 — LibRaw 8.1 High2026-04-07
CVE-2026-24450 Libraw 安全漏洞 — LibRaw 8.1 High2026-04-07
CVE-2026-20884 Libraw 安全漏洞 — LibRaw 8.1 High2026-04-07
CVE-2025-47392 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in GPS — Snapdragon 8.8 High2026-04-06
CVE-2026-34589 OpenEXR: DWA Lossy Decoder Heap Out-of-Bounds Write — openexr 9.1 -2026-04-06
CVE-2026-34380 OpenEXR has a signed integer overflow (undefined behavior) in undo_pxr24_impl may allow bounds-check bypass in PXR24 decompression — openexr 5.9 Medium2026-04-06
CVE-2026-34378 OpenEXR has a signed integer overflow in generic_unpack() when parsing EXR files with crafted negative dataWindow.min.x — openexr 6.5 Medium2026-04-06
CVE-2026-5476 NASA cFS cfe_tbl_passthru_codec.c CFE_TBL_ValidateCodecLoadSize integer overflow — cFS 4.6 Medium2026-04-03
CVE-2026-34544 OpenEXR: integer overflow to OOB write in uncompress_b44_impl() — openexr 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-01
CVE-2026-35092 Corosync: corosync: denial of service via integer overflow in join message validation — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 7.5 High2026-04-01
CVE-2026-34219 libp2p-gossipsub: Gossipsub PRUNE Backoff Heartbeat Instant Overflow — rust-libp2p 7.5AIHighAI2026-03-31
CVE-2026-33983 FreeRDP: Progressive Codec Quant BYTE Underflow - UB + CPU DoS — FreeRDP 6.5 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5121 Libarchive: libarchive: arbitrary code execution via integer overflow in iso9660 image processing — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support 7.5 High2026-03-30

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) represent 817 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.