Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-156 (空格转义处理不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4

4 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-156 (空格转义处理不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-156 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly neutralize or sanitize whitespace characters received from upstream components before passing them to downstream processes. This vulnerability typically arises when developers assume that spaces, tabs, or other control characters are harmless, allowing attackers to inject unexpected formatting that alters the interpretation of data. Exploitation often involves manipulating command-line arguments, file paths, or structured data formats like XML or JSON, where invisible whitespace can bypass security filters or cause syntax errors that lead to denial of service or code injection. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement strict input validation routines that explicitly define allowed whitespace patterns and sanitize or reject unexpected characters. Utilizing robust parsing libraries that handle whitespace normalization automatically, rather than relying on manual string manipulation, ensures consistent behavior across different environments and prevents downstream components from misinterpreting maliciously crafted input.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as whitespace when they are sent to a downstream component. This can include space, tab, etc.
Common Consequences (1)
IntegrityUnexpected State
Mitigations (4)
Developers should anticipate that whitespace will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
ImplementationWhile it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
ImplementationInputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-156 (空格转义处理不恰当) represent 4 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.