Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-141 (参数分隔符转义处理不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 7

7 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-141 (参数分隔符转义处理不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-141 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize special characters that function as delimiters for parameters or arguments. This vulnerability typically arises when an application accepts unsanitized user input and passes it directly to a downstream component, such as a command interpreter or database query engine. Attackers exploit this flaw by injecting malicious delimiters, effectively breaking the intended structure of the input string. This manipulation can cause the downstream process to interpret injected data as executable commands or distinct arguments, leading to unauthorized actions, data leakage, or system compromise. To mitigate this risk, developers must rigorously validate and escape all incoming data, ensuring that delimiter characters are neutralized or strictly controlled before processing. Implementing allow-lists and using parameterized queries further reduces the attack surface by preventing unintended interpretation of special characters.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as parameter or argument delimiters when they are sent to a downstream component. As data is parsed, an injected/absent/malformed delimiter may cause the process to take unexpected actions.
Common Consequences (1)
IntegrityUnexpected State
Mitigations (4)
Developers should anticipate that parameter/argument delimiters will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
ImplementationWhile it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
ImplementationInputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-20338 Cisco IOS XE 安全漏洞 — Cisco IOS XE Software 6.0 Medium2025-09-24
CVE-2025-31329 Information Disclosure vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform — SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform 6.2 Medium2025-05-13
CVE-2024-0840 Grandstream UCM Series IP PBX HTTP Parameter Injection — UCM Series 8.8 High2024-04-29
CVE-2022-41665 Siemens SICAM P850 和SICAM P855 安全漏洞 — SICAM P850 9.8 Critical2022-10-11
CVE-2022-29873 Siemens SICAM 安全漏洞 — SICAM T 9.8 Critical2022-05-10
CVE-2022-29872 Siemens SICAM 输入验证错误漏洞 — SICAM T 8.8 High2022-05-10
CVE-2020-7868 Helpu remote code execution vulnerability — helpu.ocx 9.6 Critical2021-06-29

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-141 (参数分隔符转义处理不恰当) represent 7 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.