Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CWE-125 (跨界内存读) — Vulnerability Class 2965

2965 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-125 (跨界内存读). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-125, Out-of-bounds Read, is a memory safety weakness where software accesses memory locations outside the designated buffer boundaries, either before its start or past its end. This vulnerability typically arises from insufficient bounds checking during array indexing or pointer arithmetic, allowing attackers to read sensitive data such as stack canaries, cryptographic keys, or internal application state. By leveraging this flaw, adversaries can achieve information disclosure or potentially facilitate further exploitation techniques like heap spraying. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation, utilizing static analysis tools to detect unsafe memory access patterns, and adopting safer programming languages or libraries that enforce automatic bounds checking. Additionally, employing compiler protections like Address Sanitizer during development helps identify these errors early, ensuring that memory reads remain strictly within allocated limits to prevent unauthorized data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (4)
ConfidentialityRead Memory
An attacker could get secret values such as cryptographic keys, PII, memory addresses, or other information that could be used in additional attacks.
ConfidentialityBypass Protection Mechanism
Out-of-bounds memory could contain memory addresses or other information that can be used to bypass ASLR and other protection mechanisms in order to improve the reliability of exploiting a separate weakness for code execution.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
An attacker could cause a segmentation fault or crash by causing memory to be read outside of the bounds of the buffer. This is especially likely when the code reads a variable amount of data and assumes that a sentinel exists to stop the read operation, such as a NUL in a string.
OtherVaries by Context
The read operation could produce other undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (2)
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Architecture and DesignUse a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
Examples (2)
In the following code, the method retrieves a value from an array at a specific array index location that is given as an input parameter to the method
int getValueFromArray(int *array, int len, int index) { int value; // check that the array index is less than the maximum // length of the array if (index < len) { // get the value at the specified index of the array value = array[index]; } // if array index is invalid then output error message // and return value indicating error else { printf("Value is: %d\n", array[index]); value = -1; } return value; }
Bad · C
... // check that the array index is within the correct // range of values for the array if (index >= 0 && index < len) { ...
Good · C
In the following C/C++ example the method processMessageFromSocket() will get a message from a socket, placed into a buffer, and will parse the contents of the buffer into a structure that contains the message length and the message body. A for loop is used to copy the message body into a local character string which will be passed to another method for processing.
int processMessageFromSocket(int socket) { int success; char buffer[BUFFER_SIZE]; char message[MESSAGE_SIZE]; // get message from socket and store into buffer //Ignoring possibliity that buffer > BUFFER_SIZE if (getMessage(socket, buffer, BUFFER_SIZE) > 0) { // place contents of the buffer into message structure ExMessage *msg = recastBuffer(buffer); // copy message body into string for processing int index; for (index = 0; index < msg->msgLength; index++) { message[index] = msg->msgBody[index]; } message[index] = '\0'; // process message success = processMessage(message); } return success; }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-29277 ZDI-CAN-20370: Adobe Substance 3D Painter USD File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Substance3D - Painter 5.5 Medium2023-05-11
CVE-2023-29275 ZDI-CAN-20363: Adobe Substance 3D Painter USD File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Painter 7.8 High2023-05-11
CVE-2023-29274 ZDI-CAN-20366: Adobe Substance 3D Painter USDC File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Painter 7.8 High2023-05-11
CVE-2023-29273 ZDI-CAN-20367: Adobe Substance 3D Painter USDC File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Painter 7.8 High2023-05-11
CVE-2023-24902 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 11 version 21H2 7.8 High2023-05-09
CVE-2023-24900 Windows NTLM Security Support Provider Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 5.9 Medium2023-05-09
CVE-2023-29461 Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation Software Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Arena Simulation 7.8 High2023-05-09
CVE-2023-29460 Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation Software Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Arena Simulation 7.8 High2023-05-09
CVE-2023-30985 Siemens Solid Edge 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Solid Edge SE2023 3.3 Low2023-05-09
CVE-2023-21511 SAMSUNG Blockchain Keystore 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Samsung Blockchain Keystore 4.4 Medium2023-05-04
CVE-2023-21510 SAMSUNG Blockchain Keystore 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Samsung Blockchain Keystore 4.4 Medium2023-05-04
CVE-2023-21507 SAMSUNG Blockchain Keystore 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Samsung Blockchain Keystore 4.4 Medium2023-05-04
CVE-2023-30546 Contiki-NG has off-by-one error in Antelope DBMS — contiki-ng 9.8 Critical2023-04-26
CVE-2023-25514 NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 5.3 Medium2023-04-22
CVE-2023-25513 NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 5.3 Medium2023-04-22
CVE-2023-25512 NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 5.3 Medium2023-04-22
CVE-2023-2226 Velociraptor crashes while parsing some malformed PE or OLE files. — Velociraptor 3.3 Low2023-04-21
CVE-2023-22846 Datakit CrossCAD/Ware — CrossCAD/Ware_x64 library 0 3.3 Low2023-04-20
CVE-2023-22354 Datakit CrossCAD/Ware — CrossCAD/Ware_x64 library 0 3.3 Low2023-04-20
CVE-2023-22321 Datakit CrossCAD/Ware — CrossCAD/Ware_x64 library 0 3.3 Low2023-04-20
CVE-2023-22295 CVE-2023-22295 — CrossCAD/Ware_x64 library 3.3 Low2023-04-20
CVE-2023-2176 Linux kernel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Kernel 7.8 -2023-04-20
CVE-2023-27353 Sonos One Speaker 缓冲区错误漏洞 — One Speaker 6.5 -2023-04-20
CVE-2023-26398 ZDI-CAN-20310: Adobe Substance 3D Designer USDC File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Designer 7.8 High2023-04-13
CVE-2023-26409 ZDI-CAN-20313: Adobe Substance 3D Designer USD File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Designer 7.8 High2023-04-13
CVE-2023-26411 ZDI-CAN-20312: Adobe Substance 3D Designer USDC File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Designer 7.8 High2023-04-13
CVE-2023-26371 Validate Your Inputs | Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) — Dimension 7.8 High2023-04-12
CVE-2023-26374 ZDI-CAN-20045: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Memory leak Vulnerability — Dimension 5.5 Medium2023-04-12
CVE-2023-26375 ZDI-CAN-20231: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Dimension 5.5 Medium2023-04-12
CVE-2023-26376 ZDI-CAN-20155: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Read Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Dimension 5.5 Medium2023-04-12

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-125 (跨界内存读) represent 2965 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.