Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-8260 D-Link DCS-935L HNAP Service hnap_service SetDeviceSettings buffer overflow — DCS-935L 8.8 High2026-05-11
CVE-2026-8137 Totolink X5000R formDdns sub_458E40 buffer overflow — X5000R 8.8 High2026-05-08
CVE-2026-6691 MongoDB C Driver Cyrus SASL Canonicalization Buffer Overflow — MongoDB C Driver 7.8 High2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7857 D-Link DI-8100 CGI user_group.asp sprintf buffer overflow — DI-8100 7.2 High2026-05-05
CVE-2026-7856 D-Link DI-8100 Web Management url_member.asp buffer overflow — DI-8100 7.2 High2026-05-05
CVE-2026-7855 D-Link DI-8100 HTTP Request tggl.asp tggl_asp buffer overflow — DI-8100 8.8 High2026-05-05
CVE-2026-7854 D-Link DI-8100 POST Parameter url_rule.asp url_rule_asp buffer overflow — DI-8100 9.8 Critical2026-05-05
CVE-2026-7853 D-Link DI-8100 HTTP auto_reboot.asp sprintf buffer overflow — DI-8100 9.8 Critical2026-05-05
CVE-2026-34956 Openvswitch: open vswitch: denial of service via malformed ftp epasv command — Fast Datapath for RHEL 7 5.9 Medium2026-05-05
CVE-2025-47404 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Automotive Audio — Snapdragon 6.5 Medium2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7750 Totolink N300RH POST Request cstecgi.cgi setMacFilterRules buffer overflow — N300RH 8.8 High2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7749 Totolink N300RH POST Request cstecgi.cgi setWanConfig buffer overflow — N300RH 8.8 High2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7748 Totolink N300RH POST Request cstecgi.cgi setUpgradeFW buffer overflow — N300RH 8.8 High2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7747 Totolink N300RH Parameter cstecgi.cgi loginauth buffer overflow — N300RH 9.8 Critical2026-05-04
CVE-2026-20449 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MediaTek chipset 7.5 -2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7735 osrg GoBGP AIGP Attribute bgp.go PathAttributeAigp.DecodeFromBytes buffer overflow — GoBGP 7.3 High2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7719 Totolink WA300 POST Request cstecgi.cgi loginauth buffer overflow — WA300 9.8 Critical2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7717 Totolink WA300 POST Request cstecgi.cgi UploadCustomModule buffer overflow — WA300 8.8 High2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7685 Edimax BR-6208AC setWAN buffer overflow — BR-6208AC 8.8 High2026-05-03
CVE-2026-7684 Edimax BR-6428nC setWAN buffer overflow — BR-6428nC 8.8 High2026-05-03
CVE-2026-7675 Shenzhen Libituo Technology LBT-T300-HW1 apply.cgi start_lan buffer overflow — LBT-T300-HW1 8.8 High2026-05-03
CVE-2026-7674 Shenzhen Libituo Technology LBT-T300-HW1 Web Management start_single_service buffer overflow — LBT-T300-HW1 8.8 High2026-05-03
CVE-2026-7607 TRENDnet TEW-821DAP Firmware Udpate auto_update_firmware buffer overflow — TEW-821DAP 8.8 High2026-05-02
CVE-2026-7513 UTT HiPER 1200GW formRemoteControl strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1200GW 8.8 High2026-04-30
CVE-2026-7512 UTT HiPER 1200GW formUser strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1200GW 8.8 High2026-04-30
CVE-2026-5404 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') in Wireshark — Wireshark 4.7 Medium2026-04-30
CVE-2026-7503 code-projects for Plugin cstecgi.cgi setWiFiMultipleConfig buffer overflow — for Plugin 8.8 High2026-04-30
CVE-2026-7420 UTT HiPER 1250GW ConfigAdvideo strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1250GW 8.8 High2026-04-29
CVE-2026-7419 UTT HiPER 1250GW formTaskEdit_ap strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1250GW 8.8 High2026-04-29
CVE-2026-7418 UTT HiPER 1250GW NTP strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1250GW 8.8 High2026-04-29

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.